Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, has warned that the global economy could face a recession if the ongoing conflict in Iran continues for over a year. He emphasized that prolonged instability would lead to skyrocketing oil prices, profoundly impacting financial markets and global economic health.

## Larry Fink Warns of Recession if Iran War Persists Beyond Year

Larry Fink, the influential CEO of BlackRock, has expressed grave concerns about the potential economic fallout from the ongoing war in Iran.

As the head of the world's largest investment firm, managing $14 trillion in assets, Fink's insights carry significant weight in global financial discussions.

He recently stated that if the conflict persists beyond a year, it could trigger a global recession, primarily due to rising oil prices.

The war in Iran has already disrupted the economic landscape, and Fink outlined two possible scenarios for the future.

In the best-case scenario, global powers could accept Iran back into the international community, allowing its oil to flow freely onto the market, which would stabilize prices.

Conversely, if Iran continues its adversarial stance, oil prices could soar to $150 a barrel or more, leading to a severe recession.

Fink's comments reflect a growing concern among investors that the conflict could have lasting repercussions on global markets.

He noted that if the war drags on, energy prices would rise, and stock markets would likely experience a significant downturn.

"If the war drags on for a year, energy prices will rise even further, and the global economy will enter a recession," he warned.

The implications of such a scenario are far-reaching.

Fink emphasized that the current volatility in oil prices could disrupt global supply chains and result in inflationary pressures across various sectors.

He pointed out that a prolonged conflict would not only affect energy markets but could also lead to increased prices for agricultural products and fertilizers, further straining the global economy.

Fink's perspective is informed by his extensive experience navigating financial crises.

BlackRock has played crucial roles in managing financial assets during significant economic downturns, including the 2008 financial crisis.

His firm was called upon by the US Treasury to help manage toxic assets, showcasing its influence and the trust placed in its capabilities.

While many on Wall Street remain cautiously optimistic about a quick resolution to the conflict, Fink's analysis serves as a reminder of the fragility of the current economic climate.

He noted that the market has been lulled into a false sense of security, believing that the war would not last long.

However, as tensions continue, the risks of a recession loom larger.

The Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for global oil shipments, remains a focal point in this conflict.

Fink highlighted that approximately 20% of the world's oil supply passes through this narrow waterway.

Continued disruptions there could lead to severe consequences for global energy markets, threatening economic stability worldwide.

In closing, Fink's warnings about the potential for a recession underscore the interconnectedness of geopolitical events and economic health.

As the situation in Iran evolves, the financial community will be closely monitoring developments, aware that the stakes are high for both markets and consumers alike.

Without a resolution, the ramifications could extend far beyond the immediate region, impacting global economies in profound ways.

As the situation develops, Fink's insights will likely continue to shape discussions among investors and policymakers alike, emphasizing the need for strategic responses to mitigate risks associated with prolonged conflicts in critical regions.

Larry Fink Warns of Recession if Iran War Persists Beyond Year

larry-fink-warns-of-recession-if-iran-war-persists-beyond-year

President Trump announced he will sign an executive order to resume pay for Department of Homeland Security employees affected by the ongoing government shutdown. This unilateral move aims to alleviate the financial strain on workers who have gone without pay for 48 days.

## Trump to Sign Order Resuming Pay for Homeland Security Workers

President Donald Trump stated on Thursday that he will soon sign an order to pay all Department of Homeland Security (DHS) employees who have gone without paychecks during the lengthy partial government shutdown, which has reached a record 48 days.

This executive action follows a similar move by Trump to resume pay for Transportation Security Administration (TSA) employees after many had called out from work, leading to significant delays at airport security lines.

The latest intervention is expected to extend to other non-law enforcement employees within DHS, including those at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the US Coast Guard.

In a social media post, Trump expressed sympathy for the families of federal workers, stating, "Their families have suffered far too long," and assured them that "help is on the way for our Brave and Patriotic Public Servants who have continued to work hard.".

Despite this unilateral move, the funding deadlock for some DHS needs is anticipated to continue into next week as the House considers passing a Senate plan it had previously rejected.

This Senate plan would fund the majority of DHS but exclude immigration enforcement operations.

The Republican leadership has reportedly coalesced around a two-step plan to fully fund DHS, aiming to resolve the impasse that has persisted as Congress left for its spring recess.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune noted that the House did not take up the bipartisan Senate plan during brief pro forma sessions, indicating uncertainty about the next steps.

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson has shifted his stance on the Senate measure, which funds most of DHS but excludes critical agencies like US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and US Border Patrol.

Johnson had previously criticized the plan but is now expected to support it, although securing backing from his own party could pose challenges.

As the Republican leadership attempts to unify, the criticism from Democrats has intensified.

Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer accused House Republicans of prolonging the shutdown and jeopardizing the livelihoods of federal workers.

Many in the GOP contend that ICE and Border Patrol must be included in any funding agreement.

Representative Scott Perry emphasized that failing to fund these agencies would equate to defunding law enforcement and leaving the borders vulnerable.

The budget package Trump intends to push for by June 1 is expected to secure funding for ICE and Border Patrol through the remainder of his term, aiming to shield these agencies from future funding disputes.

While the vast majority of DHS employees have continued to report to work, many thousands have gone without pay, contributing to rising frustrations among federal workers and air travelers alike.

As the TSA has begun receiving backpay, it appears that the bottlenecks at airport security lines are starting to ease.

In conclusion, Trump's planned executive order reflects an urgent response to the financial distress faced by DHS employees during the ongoing government shutdown.

However, significant hurdles remain in achieving a comprehensive funding resolution that satisfies all involved parties.

Trump to Sign Order Resuming Pay for Homeland Security Workers

trump-to-sign-order-resuming-pay-for-homeland-security-workers

Democrat Ford has attributed rising gas prices to former President Trump's policies, asserting that they have exacerbated costs for American families. In response, Ford outlined a series of energy policies aimed at stabilizing prices and promoting sustainable energy solutions.

## Democrat Ford Blames Trump for Rising Gas Prices, Proposes New Policies

Democrat Ford has recently criticized former President Donald Trump, attributing the surge in gas prices to Trump's energy policies.

Ford claims that Trump's actions have significantly impacted the economic landscape, particularly in terms of fuel costs for American families.

In his address, Ford pointed out that gas prices have been rising sharply, with averages projected to reach around $4 per gallon in the near future, a stark increase from previous years.

This escalation, he argues, is a direct result of Trump's regulatory decisions, which he believes have destabilized the energy market.

Ford's remarks come against a backdrop of increasing inflation and rising costs across various sectors, not just fuel.

He emphasized that the cumulative effect of Trump's policies has been detrimental to the average consumer, creating a financial burden that many families struggle to bear.

In response to these challenges, Ford laid out a comprehensive energy policy framework aimed at addressing both immediate and long-term energy needs.

He highlighted the importance of transitioning to renewable energy sources, which he believes can help mitigate future price spikes and enhance energy security.

Ford's proposed policies include measures to increase investments in clean energy technologies, which aim to reduce the nation's reliance on fossil fuels.

He believes that by prioritizing renewable energy, the US can create a more resilient energy infrastructure that can withstand global market fluctuations.

Additionally, Ford suggested that the government should implement regulatory reforms designed to streamline energy production processes.

He argued that this would not only lower costs for consumers but also encourage job growth in the green energy sector.

The Democrat also voiced support for initiatives that promote energy efficiency, such as incentives for consumers to adopt electric vehicles and energy-efficient appliances.

These measures, he claims, would lessen the overall demand for fossil fuels, thus helping to stabilize prices.

Ford's focus on energy policy comes as gas prices continue to be a major concern for voters.

The rising costs at the pump have prompted calls for action from policymakers across the political spectrum.

By positioning himself as a champion for affordable energy, Ford aims to resonate with constituents who are feeling the financial pinch.

In conclusion, Ford's critique of Trump and his energy policies reflects a broader Democratic strategy to address economic issues through sustainable practices.

By advocating for a shift towards renewable energy and implementing supportive policies, Ford hopes to alleviate the burden of high gas prices and set a course for a more stable economic future.

As the political landscape evolves, it remains to be seen how these proposals will be received by both lawmakers and the public.

However, Ford's emphasis on energy policy signals a commitment to addressing one of the most pressing issues facing American families today.

Democrat Ford Blames Trump for Rising Gas Prices, Proposes New Policies

democrat-ford-blames-trump-for-rising-gas-prices-proposes-new-policies

OpenAI has announced its acquisition of TBPN, a popular tech news show, marking a significant step into the media landscape. Co-hosts John Coogan and Jordi Hays will maintain their daily livestream schedule, while OpenAI aims to enhance its communications strategy amid its IPO preparations.

## OpenAI Acquires TBPN: A Bold Move into Tech Media

OpenAI (OPAI.PVT) has made headlines with its acquisition of TBPN, the Technology Business Programming Network, which is regarded as one of the most influential tech news shows in Silicon Valley.

The announcement was made on Thursday, and while financial details of the deal remain undisclosed, it marks a strategic expansion into the media sector for the AI giant.

TBPN, co-hosted by John Coogan and Jordi Hays, has gained significant traction since its inception in late 2024.

The show, which streams daily at 2:00 pm ET, has become a critical platform for tech executives and venture capitalists to discuss industry trends and innovations.

Coogan expressed on social media that the show's format will remain unchanged despite the acquisition, assuring viewers that they can expect the same content they have grown to love.

The decision to acquire TBPN aligns with OpenAI's broader strategy to enhance its communications and marketing capabilities as it prepares for an anticipated initial public offering (IPO) later this year.

The company recently closed a funding round that raised $122 billion, pushing its post-money valuation to approximately $852 billion, further solidifying its position in the tech landscape.

Fidji Simo, CEO of AGI Deployment at OpenAI, praised TBPN for its ability to provide a real-time window into the rapidly evolving world of AI.

He emphasized that the show serves as a vital space for industry leaders to engage in meaningful discussions about the implications of technology in everyday life.

"The TBPN team has built something special," Simo stated, indicating OpenAI's commitment to nurturing the show's independent spirit while integrating it into its wider communications strategy.

The acquisition has raised questions about how it will impact TBPN's relationships within the industry.

Some experts warn that aligning with OpenAI could limit the show's ability to attract guests from competing firms, as potential guests may hesitate to appear on a platform closely associated with a rival company.

John McCarus, a recruiter focused on the creator economy, noted that this could pose a risk to TBPN's guest diversity, although the hosts have maintained that they do not consider themselves a traditional journalistic outlet.

Despite these concerns, the hosts of TBPN have emphasized their focus on fostering discussions rather than breaking news.

"We were never in the scoop industry," Coogan remarked, reinforcing the show's commitment to providing a platform for dialogue among industry insiders.

As OpenAI steps into the media space, it joins a growing list of tech companies that are increasingly investing in branding and content creation.

Competitors like Anthropic and Microsoft have also begun to enhance their media presence, recognizing the importance of controlling the narrative around their innovations.

In this context, TBPN's acquisition could serve as a strategic advantage for OpenAI, providing a channel to guide conversations on AI and its applications in various sectors.

In conclusion, OpenAI's acquisition of TBPN signifies a bold move into the media industry, reflecting its ambition to engage more directly with the public and industry stakeholders.

As the tech landscape continues to evolve, this partnership could play a crucial role in shaping discussions around AI and its impact on society, particularly as OpenAI prepares for its IPO and seeks to solidify its market position in a competitive environment.

OpenAI Acquires TBPN: A Bold Move into Tech Media

openai-acquires-tbpn-a-bold-move-into-tech-media

Recent surveys reveal that many Americans are increasingly disillusioned with the current state of the economy under President Trump, with a significant number wishing for the economic conditions seen during Biden's presidency. Polls show that Trump's handling of economic issues has led to heightened dissatisfaction among voters.

## Trump's Economy Leaves Americans Longing for Biden's Policies

As President Donald Trump continues to promote his economic achievements, a growing number of Americans are expressing nostalgia for the economic policies of his predecessor, Joe Biden.

According to a recent Harvard CAPS/Harris survey, more than half of US voters believe the economy is worse under Trump than it was under Biden, with 62% attributing the current economic struggles to Trump's policies rather than Biden's.

Trump has long criticized Biden's economic record, labeling it a "disaster" and a "catastrophe." Yet, recent polling indicates that 65% of respondents feel Trump's policies have worsened economic conditions, the highest disapproval rate for his administration to date.

This sentiment suggests that many voters are re-evaluating the economic landscape and find themselves wishing for the stability they associate with Biden's tenure.

Despite Trump's assertions that the economy is thriving, public perception tells a different story.

A CNN report highlights that 72% of Americans disapprove of Trump's handling of inflation, surpassing Biden's disapproval rate of 68%.

Furthermore, Trump’s approval for managing the economy sits at a mere 31%, a stark contrast to Biden's past ratings.

The economic landscape has shifted significantly since Trump assumed office.

Analysts note that job creation has slowed and the unemployment rate has increased.

Dean Baker, a senior fellow at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, recently emphasized that the economy had been strong at the end of 2024, with inflation beginning to decline after a post-COVID spike.

However, subsequent tariff increases and geopolitical tensions have contributed to rising prices, undermining any progress made during Biden's presidency.

While Trump's administration claims to have improved economic conditions, many small businesses are struggling to keep up.

Reports indicate that small businesses have cut over 43,000 jobs in the last year due to failed policies, which some attribute to Trump's approach to economic management.

These statistics paint a bleak picture, suggesting that the current administration's strategies may be exacerbating the issues faced by American workers.

Moreover, the debate surrounding inflation has intensified.

Critics argue that Trump's tariffs and regulatory choices have fueled inflation, with estimates suggesting a potential rise in consumer prices as high as 2.3% due to his policies.

In contrast, Biden's administration had been working to lower inflation rates, a fact that is often overlooked in the current political discourse.

Trump's economic narrative seems to collide with the reality faced by many Americans, who are increasingly vocal about their dissatisfaction.

In light of rising prices for essential goods and services, the public is beginning to recognize that the economic conditions they are experiencing today differ significantly from the pre-pandemic era, which many attribute to Biden's policies.

The apparent longing for Biden's economic management highlights a significant challenge for Trump as he attempts to position himself for future elections.

If public sentiment continues to tilt towards a preference for the economic policies of the previous administration, it could have profound implications for Trump's re-election campaign.

Many voters appear ready to pivot back to the "halcyon days" of Biden's presidency, as Trump's economic strategies come under increasing scrutiny.

In conclusion, as the economic landscape shifts and public opinion evolves, it becomes increasingly clear that a substantial number of Americans are missing the economic stability they associate with Biden's administration.

The road ahead for Trump may be fraught with challenges as he seeks to convince voters that his approach is the right path forward for the nation's economy.

With mounting evidence of dissatisfaction, it remains to be seen how Trump will address these growing concerns among the electorate.

Trump's Economy Leaves Americans Longing for Biden's Policies

trump-s-economy-leaves-americans-longing-for-biden-s-policies

Recent polling indicates that many Americans are increasingly nostalgic for Joe Biden's economic policies as dissatisfaction with Donald Trump's handling of the economy grows. A significant majority now believe the economy has worsened under Trump's leadership, leading to calls for a return to the previous administration's policies.

## Americans Long for Biden's Economy Amid Trump's Struggles

As the 2024 election unfolds, a surprising sentiment appears to be taking hold among American voters: many are missing the economic policies of Joe Biden.

A recent Harvard CAPS/Harris survey revealed that over half of US voters believe the economy has worsened under President Donald Trump compared to Biden's tenure.

This striking shift in public opinion underscores the challenges Trump faces as he attempts to navigate his second term.

Polling data indicates that 62% of respondents attribute the current economic difficulties to Trump's policies, rather than Biden's administration.

In a revealing CNN report published on April 1, it was noted that 65% of those surveyed felt that Trump's economic policies have exacerbated the situation, marking the highest level of disapproval Trump has received during his presidency.

Americans are increasingly concerned about inflation and the overall cost of living.

The same CNN poll showed a 72% disapproval rate for Trump's handling of inflation, surpassing Biden's disapproval ratings during his presidency.

Furthermore, 76% disapprove of Trump's management of gas prices, indicating widespread dissatisfaction with his economic stewardship.

The economic landscape has become a major issue for Trump, who previously capitalized on voters' frustrations with Biden during the last election cycle.

As the cost of living continues to rise, many voters, including some who previously supported Trump, are expressing disillusionment.

The PBS News/NPR/Marist poll highlights that 57% of Americans disapprove of Trump's economic performance, which could significantly impact his approval ratings moving forward.

Economic analysts have pointed out that the current inflationary environment is partly a result of Trump's policies, including tariffs and other measures that have contributed to rising costs for consumers.

Dean Baker, a senior fellow at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, noted that while Biden's economic policies showed signs of strength by the end of 2024, Trump's approach has led to a slowdown in job creation and a rise in unemployment.

Compounding these issues, Trump's administration has faced criticism for failing to stabilize prices and for dismissing concerns about affordability as a "con job" by Democrats.

This has further alienated voters who are struggling with rising costs, including food and healthcare, which remain pressing issues for many Americans.

The political landscape is shifting as many voters express a preference for the Democratic Party on economic issues, with 40% believing Democrats would handle the economy better than Republicans.

This marks a significant turnaround from previous years when Republicans held a substantial advantage in economic matters.

In light of these developments, Trump's assertion that he was elected due to his understanding of Biden's economic failures is increasingly challenged by the reality on the ground.

Voters are not only recalling the economic conditions under Biden but are also recognizing the shortcomings of Trump's current policies.

As the midterm elections approach, Trump's ability to turn around public perception regarding the economy will be crucial.

The dissatisfaction among voters, particularly independents and moderate Republicans, could pose a significant threat to his party's prospects in upcoming elections.

In summary, as Americans grapple with economic pressures, many are beginning to long for the days of Biden's administration, highlighting the precarious position Trump finds himself in.

With polling indicating a strong desire for change, the coming months will be critical for both Trump and the Republican Party in addressing the economic concerns that now dominate voters' minds.

Americans Long for Biden's Economy Amid Trump's Struggles

americans-long-for-biden-s-economy-amid-trump-s-struggles

Deutsche Bank's economists tested the prevailing belief that AI could reduce inflation by consulting leading AI systems. Surprisingly, the robots indicated that AI is more likely to raise inflation, driven by increased demand in AI investments, than to bring about significant disinflation.

## Deutsche Bank's AI Experiment Reveals Surprising Inflation Insights

Deutsche Bank has recently drawn attention by questioning whether artificial intelligence (AI) could help resolve the economy's inflation challenges.

Their economists, led by chief US economist Matthew Luzzetti, posed this question directly to various AI systems, including their own proprietary tool, dbLumina, OpenAI's ChatGPT-5.2, and Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.6, yielding unexpected results.

The prevailing consensus among investors and economists is that AI serves as a disinflationary force, suggesting that it can replace costly human labor, enhance productivity, and reduce barriers for new businesses.

However, the AI models responded with skepticism.

All three systems indicated that the most probable outcome for inflation is minimal impact, with a surprising consensus that AI could actually raise inflation rather than lower it.

At the one-year horizon, each AI tool assigned higher probabilities for AI raising inflation compared to meaningfully reducing it.

For instance, dbLumina estimated a 40% chance that AI would contribute to inflation, while only predicting a 5% chance for a significant decline.

Claude and ChatGPT followed suit with similar assessments, highlighting a more cautious outlook than that presented by some analysts.

The primary concern identified by the AI models is the booming investment in AI technology itself.

The demand for data centers, rising semiconductor usage, and increased electricity consumption from AI workloads are all contributing factors that can lead to upward pressure on prices.

As these demands grow, they may negate the disinflationary effects that many expect from AI integration into the economy.

Luzzetti's team noted that the models' findings present a more moderate view than that of some financial analysts, who predict dire consequences such as a potential "white-collar recession." This scenario posits that AI could decimate the consumer base by automating jobs, leading to mass unemployment and reduced consumer spending.

In a thought experiment, some have imagined a future where AI leads to a phenomenon termed "ghost GDP," where economic growth is inflated by AI, yet household incomes dwindle due to job losses.

Despite these concerns, the actual adoption of AI technologies remains considerably lower than their theoretical capabilities.

A study from Anthropic found that while AI tools could automate a vast majority of tasks in high-paying fields, actual implementation is still only a fraction of that potential.

If AI eventually closes this gap, it could lead to significant downward pressure on wages and service costs, although current observations indicate no systematic rise in unemployment related to AI adoption.

Deutsche Bank's economists caution that if AI itself misjudges its inflationary impact, it could necessitate a reevaluation of how transformative AI is expected to be for sectors requiring complex knowledge work, such as forecasting.

They suggest that markets may be prematurely pricing in the disinflationary effects of AI without accounting for the actual trends occurring in the economy.

In conclusion, the response from AI regarding its potential impact on inflation underscores the complexity of the issue.

While AI is often heralded as a transformative technology, its immediate effects on inflation may be more nuanced than previously believed.

The consensus among the AI models suggests that the road to meaningful economic changes through AI integration may be longer and more uncertain than optimistic forecasts imply.

The machines' answer to their own economic legacy seems to be clear: it’s complicated.

Deutsche Bank's AI Experiment Reveals Surprising Inflation Insights

deutsche-bank-s-ai-experiment-reveals-surprising-inflation-insights

Recent polls show President Trump's approval ratings have plummeted to 39%, coinciding with rising inflation concerns among voters. As 60% of respondents blame him for the economic situation, calls for prioritizing price reduction grow louder, raising questions about the Republican party's prospects in upcoming elections.

## Trump's Approval Ratings Dwindle Amid Inflation Concerns

Recent polling data indicates a significant decline in President Donald Trump's approval ratings, now at just 39%, the lowest since the aftermath of the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol.

This drop comes as inflation continues to be a pressing concern for many Americans, with nearly 60% of voters blaming Trump and congressional Republicans for the current economic situation.

The NPR/PBS News/Marist poll conducted from November 10-13 reveals that Trump's handling of inflation is widely criticized, with 61% of respondents expressing little to no confidence in his leadership.

The survey highlights a broader discontent with both major political parties, as 80% of respondents reported a lack of confidence in Congress and significant portions of the electorate view both parties as disconnected from the needs of everyday Americans.

A critical aspect of this discontent is the rising cost of living.

Approximately 54% of US adults categorize the cost of groceries as a major source of stress, reflecting the financial strain on households.

This concern is echoed in the poll, where 57% believe lowering prices should be Trump's top priority, far surpassing issues like immigration, which garnered only 16% support.

Despite the political fallout from inflation, Trump's base remains largely supportive, with 9-in-10 Republicans continuing to approve of his job performance.

However, this approval does not extend to his handling of economic issues, as only 36% of US adults approve of his economic management, a figure that remains stagnant in light of rising inflation and uncertainty.

Trump's use of tariffs as a protectionist trade policy has also faced criticism for exacerbating inflation.

Economists warn that proposed tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China could increase costs for American families significantly, potentially by thousands of dollars annually.

This is particularly concerning given that 78% of voters recently identified inflation as a moderate or severe hardship.

The political implications of these inflationary pressures are noteworthy.

Historical data suggests a strong correlation between inflation expectations and presidential approval ratings; when inflation rises, approval typically declines.

If current trends continue, Trump's approval ratings could face further erosion as voters increasingly link economic hardship to his administration.

In preparation for the 2026 midterm elections, the landscape appears more favorable for Democrats, who currently hold a 14-point lead over Republicans in hypothetical congressional matchups.

Topic

Economy

Recent articles:

Trump to Sign Order Resuming Pay for Homeland Security Workers

Democrat Ford Blames Trump for Rising Gas Prices, Proposes New Policies

OpenAI Acquires TBPN: A Bold Move into Tech Media

Trump's Economy Leaves Americans Longing for Biden's Policies

Americans Long for Biden's Economy Amid Trump's Struggles

Deutsche Bank's AI Experiment Reveals Surprising Inflation Insights

Trump's Approval Ratings Dwindle Amid Inflation Concerns

Maine Moves to Explore Polluter Accountability for Climate Costs

Larry Fink Warns: Prolonged Iran War Could Trigger Global Recession

Lawmakers Seek Confidential Meeting on LNG Project Details

US Hiring Plummets to Pandemic Lows Amid Economic Stagnation

Vanguard ETF Outpaces Major Indices in 2026 Amid Economic Turmoil

Preparing for a Potential U.S. Recession: Key Strategies

The Fed, AI, and Economic Uncertainty: Insights for Investors

Understanding Recessions: Insights from a Trump White House Economist

Powell Signals Fed's Cautious Approach Amid War and Inflation Concerns

Fed Chair Powell: No Contagion Risk in Private Credit, Rates in Good Place

$10 Trillion in Carbon Costs: U.S. Emissions Impact Global Economy

Wall Street Anticipates TACO as Iran Conflict Escalates