Todd Blanche has been named acting Attorney General by President Trump, following his tenure as Deputy Attorney General. A former personal attorney to Trump, Blanche has represented him in several high-profile legal battles, including cases related to classified documents and election interference.

## Todd Blanche: Trump’s Acting Attorney General and Legal Strategist

Todd Blanche has stepped into the role of acting Attorney General after President Donald Trump dismissed his predecessor, Pam Bondi.

This appointment comes on the heels of Blanche's service as Deputy Attorney General, a position he assumed in March 2025, and marks a significant moment in his legal career, which has been closely tied to Trump's legal challenges.

Born on August 6, 1974, in Denver, Colorado, Blanche has built a reputation as a formidable attorney, particularly in white-collar criminal defense.

Before his involvement with Trump, he worked for the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, focusing on violent crimes.

His legal acumen led him to become a partner at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, where he represented several high-profile clients, including Trump's former associates during various investigations.

Blanche's close relationship with Trump began to flourish as he took on significant roles in multiple high-stakes cases.

He was instrumental in defending Trump against allegations related to mishandling classified documents and his alleged role in the January 6 insurrection.

Notably, he represented Trump in the hush money case involving adult film actress Stormy Daniels, which resulted in Trump's conviction on 34 felony counts for falsifying business records.

Despite the conviction, Trump has claimed he did nothing wrong and is appealing the ruling with a different legal team.

During his time as Deputy Attorney General, Blanche was known for his aggressive approach to litigation and his public-facing role in the Justice Department.

He frequently appeared alongside Trump, projecting confidence and a strong public persona, which the former president values highly.

This alignment has drawn both praise and criticism, particularly regarding the handling of investigations into Trump’s political opponents, which have faced legal hurdles and challenges in court.

Despite his lack of traditional political experience, Blanche's ascent in the Justice Department reflects a broader trend within Trump's administration, where loyalty and personal relationships often take precedence over conventional qualifications.

His appointment as acting Attorney General comes at a critical juncture, as he will need to navigate ongoing legal battles while maintaining the support of Trump and the political apparatus surrounding the president.

In recent statements, Blanche has made headlines for his remarks regarding the FBI and the Justice Department, claiming that those involved in the investigations against Trump have been purged from the agencies.

This assertion has prompted legal challenges from former FBI employees, who allege that Blanche's comments could be construed as retaliatory against those who investigated Trump.

As acting Attorney General, Blanche's next steps will be closely watched, particularly as the Trump administration continues to face scrutiny over its legal strategies and governance.

If he aims to solidify his position in the role permanently, he will need Senate confirmation, a process that could prove contentious given the current political climate.

In summary, Todd Blanche's appointment as acting Attorney General underscores the intertwining of legal and political strategies within Trump's administration.

His background as a personal attorney to Trump and his aggressive legal strategies will likely define his tenure in this pivotal role during a time of significant legal challenges for the former president and his associates.

Blanche's ability to navigate these complexities will be crucial as he seeks to carry out the administration's objectives in the face of ongoing investigations and legal scrutiny.

Todd Blanche: Trump’s Acting Attorney General and Legal Strategist

todd-blanche-trump-s-acting-attorney-general-and-legal-strategist

Pam Bondi, once a loyal supporter of Donald Trump and former Florida Attorney General, has faced significant challenges in her political career, ultimately leading to her downfall. Despite her unwavering loyalty, Bondi's actions and decisions have raised questions about her effectiveness and future in the political arena.

## Pam Bondi's Loyalty to Trump Fails to Secure Her Position

Pam Bondi, the former Florida Attorney General, has long been known for her staunch loyalty to Donald Trump.

However, her unwavering allegiance has not shielded her from the consequences of her political decisions and actions.

Once a prominent figure in Florida's political landscape, Bondi's career trajectory has taken a troubling turn in the face of mounting scrutiny and criticism.

Bondi's relationship with Trump dates back to 2006 when she first defended him during a legal dispute in Palm Beach.

This initial connection blossomed into a supportive alliance that saw her rise through the ranks of Florida politics, eventually winning the attorney general's office in 2010.

Throughout her tenure, Bondi became closely associated with the Trump administration, often appearing in public alongside him and advocating for his policies.

Despite her loyalty, Bondi's tenure has not been without controversy.

Her handling of significant issues, particularly in the context of her role as attorney general, has drawn criticism.

One of the most pressing concerns has been her approach to the Epstein files, which have become a political liability for both her and Trump.

Reports indicate that Bondi has failed to comply with a federal law requiring the release of unclassified documents related to Epstein, leading to frustration from Trump and raising questions about her competence.

In a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Bondi's performance was marked by aggressive confrontations with Democratic senators, which some observers interpreted as an attempt to deflect attention from her own shortcomings.

Her calculated responses, while demonstrating her loyalty to Trump, also highlighted her transformation from a prosecutor to a political warrior, leaving many to wonder what happened to the more approachable and kindhearted individual she once was.

Critics have pointed out that Bondi's commitment to Trump has come at a cost to her integrity and effectiveness.

As she has embraced a confrontational style in her role, she has faced backlash not only from political opponents but also from former allies within her own party.

Trump's reported dissatisfaction with her pace in pursuing cases against political adversaries has further exacerbated her precarious position.

The fallout from Bondi's tenure has raised questions about the future of her political career.

Despite her previous prominence, there are signs that her loyalty to Trump may not be enough to salvage her position.

Observers note that while loyalty is a prized trait in Trump's inner circle, it is often coupled with a demand for results.

Bondi's inability to deliver on key issues, particularly those tied to the Epstein scandal, may ultimately be her undoing.

Her story serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of political loyalty without accountability.

As she navigates the tumultuous waters of Trump's administration, Bondi's past successes as a prosecutor and attorney general seem to be overshadowed by the growing concerns over her effectiveness and integrity.

The political landscape is unforgiving, and Bondi's experience underscores the reality that even the most loyal supporters can find themselves on shaky ground.

In conclusion, Pam Bondi's journey through the political arena reflects the complexities of loyalty in a high-stakes environment.

While her allegiance to Trump has been unwavering, the challenges she faces highlight the importance of maintaining a balance between loyalty and accountability.

As she moves forward, the question remains whether Bondi can reclaim her standing in the political sphere or if her commitment to Trump will ultimately lead to her downfall.

Pam Bondi's Loyalty to Trump Fails to Secure Her Position

pam-bondi-s-loyalty-to-trump-fails-to-secure-her-position

Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, has warned that the global economy could face a recession if the ongoing conflict in Iran continues for over a year. He emphasized that prolonged instability would lead to skyrocketing oil prices, profoundly impacting financial markets and global economic health.

## Larry Fink Warns of Recession if Iran War Persists Beyond Year

Larry Fink, the influential CEO of BlackRock, has expressed grave concerns about the potential economic fallout from the ongoing war in Iran.

As the head of the world's largest investment firm, managing $14 trillion in assets, Fink's insights carry significant weight in global financial discussions.

He recently stated that if the conflict persists beyond a year, it could trigger a global recession, primarily due to rising oil prices.

The war in Iran has already disrupted the economic landscape, and Fink outlined two possible scenarios for the future.

In the best-case scenario, global powers could accept Iran back into the international community, allowing its oil to flow freely onto the market, which would stabilize prices.

Conversely, if Iran continues its adversarial stance, oil prices could soar to $150 a barrel or more, leading to a severe recession.

Fink's comments reflect a growing concern among investors that the conflict could have lasting repercussions on global markets.

He noted that if the war drags on, energy prices would rise, and stock markets would likely experience a significant downturn.

"If the war drags on for a year, energy prices will rise even further, and the global economy will enter a recession," he warned.

The implications of such a scenario are far-reaching.

Fink emphasized that the current volatility in oil prices could disrupt global supply chains and result in inflationary pressures across various sectors.

He pointed out that a prolonged conflict would not only affect energy markets but could also lead to increased prices for agricultural products and fertilizers, further straining the global economy.

Fink's perspective is informed by his extensive experience navigating financial crises.

BlackRock has played crucial roles in managing financial assets during significant economic downturns, including the 2008 financial crisis.

His firm was called upon by the US Treasury to help manage toxic assets, showcasing its influence and the trust placed in its capabilities.

While many on Wall Street remain cautiously optimistic about a quick resolution to the conflict, Fink's analysis serves as a reminder of the fragility of the current economic climate.

He noted that the market has been lulled into a false sense of security, believing that the war would not last long.

However, as tensions continue, the risks of a recession loom larger.

The Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for global oil shipments, remains a focal point in this conflict.

Fink highlighted that approximately 20% of the world's oil supply passes through this narrow waterway.

Continued disruptions there could lead to severe consequences for global energy markets, threatening economic stability worldwide.

In closing, Fink's warnings about the potential for a recession underscore the interconnectedness of geopolitical events and economic health.

As the situation in Iran evolves, the financial community will be closely monitoring developments, aware that the stakes are high for both markets and consumers alike.

Without a resolution, the ramifications could extend far beyond the immediate region, impacting global economies in profound ways.

As the situation develops, Fink's insights will likely continue to shape discussions among investors and policymakers alike, emphasizing the need for strategic responses to mitigate risks associated with prolonged conflicts in critical regions.

Larry Fink Warns of Recession if Iran War Persists Beyond Year

larry-fink-warns-of-recession-if-iran-war-persists-beyond-year

French President Emmanuel Macron rebuked US President Donald Trump after Trump made mocking remarks about Macron's marriage during a private event. Macron described the comments as 'neither elegant nor up to standard' and emphasized the need for focus on international stability.

## Macron Responds to Trump's Mockery of His Marriage

French President Emmanuel Macron has publicly rebuked US President Donald Trump following mockery directed at his marriage during a private lunch.

Trump's comments, made in a disparaging tone, referenced Macron's wife, Brigitte, suggesting she treats him poorly and alluded to a past incident that had been widely misinterpreted as a personal dispute between the couple.

During the lunch, Trump imitated a French accent and stated, "I called up France, Macron—whose wife treats him extremely badly.

Still recovering from the right to the jaw." This remark is believed to reference a video from 2025, where Brigitte Macron appeared to push her husband's face during an official trip.

Responding to the comments while visiting South Korea, Macron expressed his discontent, stating that Trump's remarks were "neither elegant nor up to standard." He further noted that such comments did not merit a response, suggesting that the focus should be on serious global issues rather than personal jabs.

The French president emphasized, "We all need stability, calm, and a return to peace—this isn't a show!" This comment reflects Macron's broader frustration with Trump's approach to international relations, particularly regarding the ongoing tensions in the Middle East.

The backlash in France was swift, with politicians across the spectrum denouncing Trump's comments.

Manuel Bompard, a leading far-left lawmaker, condemned the remarks as "absolutely unacceptable," while Yaël Braun-Pivet, the centrist president of the French National Assembly, criticized Trump for trivializing serious geopolitical issues amidst ongoing conflicts.

The relationship between Macron and Trump has been marked by both camaraderie and contention.

Initially, the two leaders enjoyed a friendly rapport during Trump's first term, but tensions have escalated due to diverging views on foreign policy, especially regarding NATO and the US-Israeli military actions in Iran.

France has maintained a cautious stance regarding military support in the region, opting not to join the US-led offensive against Iran.

Instead, France has deployed some military resources to the Persian Gulf while refusing to provide naval support for reopening the Strait of Hormuz.

The incident highlights a growing rift between the two leaders, where personal relationships have begun to intertwine with political discourse.

Macron's response indicates a desire to focus on substantive issues rather than engaging in personal attacks, which he deems unproductive.

As international leaders navigate complex geopolitical landscapes, Macron's comments serve as a reminder that personal dignity, especially regarding family, should be upheld in political discussions.

The French president's insistence on seriousness in political dialogue underscores the challenges leaders face in maintaining respect amidst the pressures of public and political scrutiny.

In summary, the mocking remarks made by Trump not only drew ire from Macron but also sparked a broader conversation regarding the appropriateness of personal attacks in political discourse, particularly when serious global issues are at stake.

Macron Responds to Trump's Mockery of His Marriage

macron-responds-to-trump-s-mockery-of-his-marriage

President Trump announced he will sign an executive order to resume pay for Department of Homeland Security employees affected by the ongoing government shutdown. This unilateral move aims to alleviate the financial strain on workers who have gone without pay for 48 days.

## Trump to Sign Order Resuming Pay for Homeland Security Workers

President Donald Trump stated on Thursday that he will soon sign an order to pay all Department of Homeland Security (DHS) employees who have gone without paychecks during the lengthy partial government shutdown, which has reached a record 48 days.

This executive action follows a similar move by Trump to resume pay for Transportation Security Administration (TSA) employees after many had called out from work, leading to significant delays at airport security lines.

The latest intervention is expected to extend to other non-law enforcement employees within DHS, including those at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the US Coast Guard.

In a social media post, Trump expressed sympathy for the families of federal workers, stating, "Their families have suffered far too long," and assured them that "help is on the way for our Brave and Patriotic Public Servants who have continued to work hard.".

Despite this unilateral move, the funding deadlock for some DHS needs is anticipated to continue into next week as the House considers passing a Senate plan it had previously rejected.

This Senate plan would fund the majority of DHS but exclude immigration enforcement operations.

The Republican leadership has reportedly coalesced around a two-step plan to fully fund DHS, aiming to resolve the impasse that has persisted as Congress left for its spring recess.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune noted that the House did not take up the bipartisan Senate plan during brief pro forma sessions, indicating uncertainty about the next steps.

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson has shifted his stance on the Senate measure, which funds most of DHS but excludes critical agencies like US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and US Border Patrol.

Johnson had previously criticized the plan but is now expected to support it, although securing backing from his own party could pose challenges.

As the Republican leadership attempts to unify, the criticism from Democrats has intensified.

Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer accused House Republicans of prolonging the shutdown and jeopardizing the livelihoods of federal workers.

Many in the GOP contend that ICE and Border Patrol must be included in any funding agreement.

Representative Scott Perry emphasized that failing to fund these agencies would equate to defunding law enforcement and leaving the borders vulnerable.

The budget package Trump intends to push for by June 1 is expected to secure funding for ICE and Border Patrol through the remainder of his term, aiming to shield these agencies from future funding disputes.

While the vast majority of DHS employees have continued to report to work, many thousands have gone without pay, contributing to rising frustrations among federal workers and air travelers alike.

As the TSA has begun receiving backpay, it appears that the bottlenecks at airport security lines are starting to ease.

In conclusion, Trump's planned executive order reflects an urgent response to the financial distress faced by DHS employees during the ongoing government shutdown.

However, significant hurdles remain in achieving a comprehensive funding resolution that satisfies all involved parties.

Trump to Sign Order Resuming Pay for Homeland Security Workers

trump-to-sign-order-resuming-pay-for-homeland-security-workers

Democrat Ford has attributed rising gas prices to former President Trump's policies, asserting that they have exacerbated costs for American families. In response, Ford outlined a series of energy policies aimed at stabilizing prices and promoting sustainable energy solutions.

## Democrat Ford Blames Trump for Rising Gas Prices, Proposes New Policies

Democrat Ford has recently criticized former President Donald Trump, attributing the surge in gas prices to Trump's energy policies.

Ford claims that Trump's actions have significantly impacted the economic landscape, particularly in terms of fuel costs for American families.

In his address, Ford pointed out that gas prices have been rising sharply, with averages projected to reach around $4 per gallon in the near future, a stark increase from previous years.

This escalation, he argues, is a direct result of Trump's regulatory decisions, which he believes have destabilized the energy market.

Ford's remarks come against a backdrop of increasing inflation and rising costs across various sectors, not just fuel.

He emphasized that the cumulative effect of Trump's policies has been detrimental to the average consumer, creating a financial burden that many families struggle to bear.

In response to these challenges, Ford laid out a comprehensive energy policy framework aimed at addressing both immediate and long-term energy needs.

He highlighted the importance of transitioning to renewable energy sources, which he believes can help mitigate future price spikes and enhance energy security.

Ford's proposed policies include measures to increase investments in clean energy technologies, which aim to reduce the nation's reliance on fossil fuels.

He believes that by prioritizing renewable energy, the US can create a more resilient energy infrastructure that can withstand global market fluctuations.

Additionally, Ford suggested that the government should implement regulatory reforms designed to streamline energy production processes.

He argued that this would not only lower costs for consumers but also encourage job growth in the green energy sector.

The Democrat also voiced support for initiatives that promote energy efficiency, such as incentives for consumers to adopt electric vehicles and energy-efficient appliances.

These measures, he claims, would lessen the overall demand for fossil fuels, thus helping to stabilize prices.

Ford's focus on energy policy comes as gas prices continue to be a major concern for voters.

The rising costs at the pump have prompted calls for action from policymakers across the political spectrum.

By positioning himself as a champion for affordable energy, Ford aims to resonate with constituents who are feeling the financial pinch.

In conclusion, Ford's critique of Trump and his energy policies reflects a broader Democratic strategy to address economic issues through sustainable practices.

By advocating for a shift towards renewable energy and implementing supportive policies, Ford hopes to alleviate the burden of high gas prices and set a course for a more stable economic future.

As the political landscape evolves, it remains to be seen how these proposals will be received by both lawmakers and the public.

However, Ford's emphasis on energy policy signals a commitment to addressing one of the most pressing issues facing American families today.

Democrat Ford Blames Trump for Rising Gas Prices, Proposes New Policies

democrat-ford-blames-trump-for-rising-gas-prices-proposes-new-policies

The Trump administration's erratic handling of federal health grants is causing significant disruptions in Nevada's public health programs. Officials report that funding volatility has hampered recruitment and retention of staff, complicating efforts to maintain essential health services.

## Trump Administration's Health Grant Volatility Disrupts Nevada Programs

The Trump administration's abrupt cancellation and possible reinstatement of federal health grants have led to significant "funding volatility" in Nevada's public health programs.

Officials reported that ongoing cuts and policy changes are creating challenges for state and local health agencies in maintaining their operations and workforce.

Julia Peek, deputy administrator for the state Division of Public and Behavioral Health, described funding volatility as "probably the most painful part of our jobs right now." She emphasized the difficulties in recruiting staff for federally funded programs when there is uncertainty about funding continuity.

During a recent meeting of the Interim Committee on Health and Human Services, state lawmakers were briefed about the impacts of federal policy changes under the Trump administration.

State Senator Fabian Doñate (D-Las Vegas), chair of the committee, requested a comprehensive list of displaced workers and grants that have been cut in the past two years.

The Trump administration has made sweeping cuts to federal health grants over the last year, affecting disease prevention and treatment programs as well as support for behavioral and mental health services.

Officials reported instances where states received last-minute notifications of significant funding cuts, leading to panic among health officials.

A notable example occurred in January when the administration announced the cancellation of billions in mental health grants, creating chaos as states scrambled to respond.

The lack of timely information about grant renewals has also hindered health agencies.

Recently, Nevada health officials were uncertain until late last month whether the administration would renew funding for the Title X family planning grant, which is crucial for reproductive health services.

The state received only a few days' notice to reapply for the grant, which typically renews on April 1.

In response to federal funding instability, Nevada lawmakers passed Senate Bill 118 in 2023, allocating $15 million to support local health authorities in identifying and funding community health needs.

However, the expected expansion of local health initiatives has been compromised by "more volatility than expected" at the federal level, forcing agencies to use these funds to fill gaps left by federal cuts.

William Bendick, public health laboratory manager at the Southern Nevada Health District, noted that a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was essential for maintaining a 40-person staff responsible for disease monitoring.

Without state public health funding, he indicated that staffing could be reduced by 25%, which would severely impact local surveillance testing.

The instability in federal funding has contributed to challenges in retaining qualified staff.

Jeanne Freeman from Carson City's Health and Human Services reported losing five employees who sought more stable job opportunities due to the insecurity surrounding federal funding.

She also highlighted that state funds allocated under SB 118 only cover a fraction of the costs needed to fill these critical positions.

As officials reviewed the situation, they expressed concern that the funding volatility experienced last year shows no signs of improving this year.

The unpredictability surrounding federal health grants creates an environment that complicates the management of health services across Nevada.

In summary, the Trump administration's erratic approach to federal health grants is having a profound impact on Nevada's public health infrastructure.

The instability in funding not only affects the viability of health programs but also poses significant challenges in staffing, ultimately jeopardizing the health services available to the community.

Trump Administration's Health Grant Volatility Disrupts Nevada Programs

trump-administration-s-health-grant-volatility-disrupts-nevada-programs

A Colorado appeals court has ordered the resentencing of former Mesa County clerk Tina Peters, who was convicted for her role in a scheme to access sensitive election data. The court ruled that her original sentence improperly penalized her for protected speech related to election fraud claims.

## Colorado Appeals Court Orders Resentencing for Tina Peters in Election Fraud Case

A Colorado appeals court has ruled that former county clerk Tina Peters should be resentenced due to improper considerations made during her original sentencing.

Peters is currently serving a nine-year prison sentence for her role in a scheme that sought to access and tamper with election data in an effort to support unfounded claims of fraud from the 2020 presidential election.

The Colorado Court of Appeals upheld Peters' conviction but found that the trial judge, Matthew Barrett, had acted improperly by factoring her promotion of election fraud conspiracies into the sentencing decision.

The court's ruling emphasized that her beliefs, however misguided, should not have influenced her punishment.

Peters was convicted in August 2024 after allowing an outside computer expert to access her county's voting systems during a software update in 2021.

This unauthorized access led to the dissemination of confidential election data, which was shared on social media and far-right platforms, further fueling conspiracy theories surrounding the 2020 election.

During the original sentencing, Judge Barrett described Peters as a "charlatan" who abused her position and promoted "snake oil" claims.

The appeals court found that the trial court's comments about her beliefs exceeded relevant considerations for sentencing, ruling that her criminal actions, not her speech, constituted the offense.

The court has now sent the case back to a lower court for resentencing, which cannot occur for at least 42 days to allow parties the opportunity to appeal.

Peters' attorney, John Case, indicated that they would likely request a sentence of time served, potentially allowing her release after serving approximately 540 days.

The case has drawn significant attention, becoming a rallying point for those involved in the election denial movement.

Former President Donald Trump has vocally supported Peters, attempting to secure her release and even issuing a symbolic pardon that the appeals court determined had no legal effect on her state convictions.

Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser has pointed out that, regardless of any changes in sentencing, Peters will remain a convicted felon who endangered public trust in the electoral process.

In response to the court's decision, Democratic Governor Jared Polis praised the ruling for affirming free speech rights while rejecting the notion of federal pardon authority over state crimes.

The ongoing political ramifications include pressures from Trump and his allies, who have claimed that Colorado is facing consequences for not releasing Peters, with threats of federal retaliation.

As the resentencing process unfolds, it remains to be seen how the judicial system will balance the principles of accountability and free speech in this controversial case, which has become emblematic of the broader national debate surrounding election integrity and conspiracy theories.

The story of Tina Peters continues to illustrate the complexities of election law and the tensions that arise when personal beliefs clash with legal responsibilities and public trust in democracy.

Colorado Appeals Court Orders Resentencing for Tina Peters in Election Fraud Case

colorado-appeals-court-orders-resentencing-for-tina-peters-in-election-fraud-case

EqualityMaine asserts that the recent US Supreme Court ruling regarding conversion therapy will not affect Maine's existing laws. The state continues to uphold its prohibition against the practice, which has been discredited by medical professionals.

## Supreme Court Ruling on Conversion Therapy Has Minimal Impact in Maine

Topic

Politics

Recent articles:

Pam Bondi's Loyalty to Trump Fails to Secure Her Position

Larry Fink Warns of Recession if Iran War Persists Beyond Year

Macron Responds to Trump's Mockery of His Marriage

Trump to Sign Order Resuming Pay for Homeland Security Workers

Democrat Ford Blames Trump for Rising Gas Prices, Proposes New Policies

Trump Administration's Health Grant Volatility Disrupts Nevada Programs

Colorado Appeals Court Orders Resentencing for Tina Peters in Election Fraud Case

Supreme Court Ruling on Conversion Therapy Has Minimal Impact in Maine

Iran's Revolutionary Guard Threatens Tech Giants Amid Rising Tensions

Political Alliances in LA's Top-Two Race Create Unlikely Dynamics

Trump's Celebrity Endorsements: Famous Faces for the 47th President

The Resurrection Debate: Examining Evidence and Belief

Vermont Defends Fossil Fuel Accountability Law Amid Trump Administration Challenge

Tech Giants Cut H-1B Petitions Amid New Visa Restrictions

Political Landscape Shifts as California Responds to Trump Redistricting

Trump's White House Ballroom Gains Approval Amid Legal Challenges

Trump's Economy Leaves Americans Longing for Biden's Policies

Trump's Unprecedented Front-Row Seat at Supreme Court Hearing

Iowa Senate Revises Mental Health Bill, Removing Key Insurance Limits