Don Lemon Vows to Fight Federal Charges After Church Protest Arrest

Jan 31, 2026, 2:44 AM
Image for article Don Lemon Vows to Fight Federal Charges After Church Protest Arrest

Hover over text to view sources

Journalist Don Lemon has vowed to challenge the federal charges brought against him following his arrest during a protest at a Minnesota church. The incident occurred on January 18 when Lemon and another journalist, Georgia Fort, were livestreaming a demonstration against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) at Cities Church in St. Paul, where an ICE official serves as pastor.
Lemon, formerly a CNN anchor and now an independent journalist, expressed defiance outside the federal courthouse in Los Angeles after his release. "I have spent my entire career covering the news - I will not stop now," he stated, emphasizing the importance of a free and independent media during this time.
The federal indictment alleges that Lemon participated in a "takeover-style attack" on the church, where he and other protestors allegedly intimidated congregants. Prosecutors have charged him with conspiring to violate constitutional rights and violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, which protects individuals' rights to worship without intimidation or obstruction.
During his court appearance, prosecutors sought a $100,000 bond, arguing that Lemon "knowingly joined a mob to storm into a church," further claiming that he intended to create a traumatic experience for congregants. However, Lemon's defense attorney, Marilyn Bednarski, argued for his release, stating that he has a long history of non-violent conduct and intends to plead not guilty.
Lemon was ultimately released on his own recognizance, with conditions including no contact with witnesses or victims and prior approval for foreign travel. He has a scheduled court appearance on February 9 in Minneapolis.
The charges have drawn widespread criticism from civil rights advocates and journalism organizations. Many see the arrests as an alarming attack on press freedoms, with the National Association of Black Journalists expressing outrage over the implications for journalists covering protests and community issues. They called the arrests an attempt to "criminalize and threaten press freedom under the guise of law enforcement".
Lemon's legal team, led by attorney Abbe Lowell, has been vocal in asserting that the charges are politically motivated, suggesting they reflect a broader pattern of intimidation against journalists by the Trump administration. "Don will fight these charges vigorously and thoroughly in court," Lowell stated, emphasizing the constitutional protections afforded to journalists.
The protest at Cities Church was motivated by outrage over the shootings of two US citizens by federal immigration authorities, which had heightened tensions in the community. Protesters, including Lemon, voiced their demands for accountability, chanting slogans related to the incidents involving ICE officials.
In the wake of the arrests, various press freedom advocates, including the Committee to Protect Journalists, have condemned the actions taken against Lemon and Fort. They argue that such measures threaten the fundamental principles of a democratic society where journalists can operate freely without fear of prosecution for their reporting activities.
As Lemon prepares to defend himself against these serious federal charges, the case raises critical questions about the limits of press freedom, especially in the context of politically charged protests and the role of journalists in documenting social movements. The upcoming hearings will likely attract significant media attention, as the implications for press rights continue to resonate across the nation.
Lemon remains resolute, asserting, "You're not gonna diminish my voice," as he embraces his role as a journalist dedicated to uncovering the truth.
The unfolding situation highlights the ongoing tensions between governmental authority and civil liberties, particularly regarding the rights of journalists to report on events that may challenge the status quo.
As the case progresses, it will be closely watched not just for its legal ramifications but also for its potential impact on the future of journalism in America.

Related articles

Hijacking Trump's Religious Liberty Council: A Critical Examination

The establishment of President Trump's Religious Liberty Council has sparked controversy as many believe it prioritizes the interests of specific religious groups over the broader principles of religious freedom. Critics argue that the council's activities may lead to discrimination under the guise of protecting religious liberty, raising concerns about its implications for vulnerable communities.

New Mexico Faith Leaders Seek Political Engagement Amid Partisanship

In the politically charged landscape shaped by recent events, female faith leaders in New Mexico are prioritizing political engagement over partisan divides. They advocate for community involvement and aim to address critical issues like social justice, education, and healthcare, fostering unity rather than division.

Dueling National Prayer Breakfasts Highlight Immigration Policy Divide

The recent National Prayer Breakfasts in Washington showcased a stark divide in religious and political views, particularly regarding President Trump's immigration policies. While Trump emphasized his administration's achievements and criticized his opponents, the contrasting event at the Capitol focused on unity and reflection on scripture.

Trump Celebrates Religious Achievements at National Prayer Breakfast

At the National Prayer Breakfast, Donald Trump highlighted his administration's achievements concerning religious liberty and criticized political opponents. He announced a new initiative to rededicate America to God and emphasized his commitment to supporting conservative Christian values.

Senate Bill 11 Deadline Approaching: Schools Decide on Prayer Periods

Texas school boards face a March 1 deadline to decide on implementing Senate Bill 11, which allows optional periods for prayer and religious study in schools. The bill has sparked significant debate among educators and faith leaders regarding its implications for student rights and religious freedom.