PG County Settles Lawsuit with Muslim Chaplain Over Discrimination

Jan 29, 2026, 2:48 AM

Hover over text to view sources

Prince George's County has reached a settlement in a federal lawsuit involving Imam Edrees Bridges, who alleged religious discrimination when applying for a chaplaincy position at the county jail. The county will pay Bridges $195,000 and restore him as a volunteer chaplain, as part of the settlement agreement reached just before a trial was set to begin in federal court.

Bridges, who has a background as a special agent for the US Capitol Police, initially served as a volunteer chaplain at the Prince George's County Correctional Center starting in 2018. However, he had to stop due to the pandemic. The legal troubles began when Bridges was encouraged by the executive director of Prison Ministry of America (PMA), a Christian nonprofit contracted by the county, to apply for a supervisory chaplain position. Upon reviewing the application, Bridges found it required him to sign a "Statement of Applicant's Christian Faith," which he felt was discriminatory given his Muslim beliefs.

Imam Bridges subsequently filed a lawsuit in 2021, claiming the job application violated his First Amendment rights, specifically the free exercise of religion and the separation of church and state. The county, through its representatives, initially stated it was unaware of the Christian requirement in the application process. Nonetheless, legal experts argued that the requirement was clear and effectively barred Bridges from applying for a position that should have been open to all qualified candidates, regardless of their faith.

The settlement not only involves financial compensation but also includes a commitment from PMA to refrain from using similar religious hiring requirements in the future. The county's agreement to reinstate Bridges as a volunteer chaplain is seen as a significant step towards fostering inclusive practices within the correctional facility.

John Fossum, a staff attorney with the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which represented Bridges, emphasized the importance of this case as a matter of religious freedom. He stated, “The First Amendment protects all of us,” highlighting that the outcome serves to uphold the constitutional rights of individuals in similar situations.

Bridges expressed gratitude for the resolution, viewing it as a victory not only for himself but for all chaplains and individuals advocating for religious freedom in the United States. He remarked, “This is an important victory for all chaplains and all those who believe in upholding our collective constitutionally-protected right to religious freedom in our country.”.

The implications of this case extend beyond Bridges' individual experience, as it raises broader questions about the treatment of religious minorities in correctional facilities and the importance of ensuring that religious services are provided without discrimination. The settlement is a step towards ensuring that incarcerated individuals have access to diverse religious support, which is essential for their spiritual well-being.

As the county moves forward, it is expected that the lessons learned from this case will influence future policies regarding the hiring of chaplains and the provision of religious services in correctional facilities across the nation. The commitment to equality and inclusivity in religious practices reflects a growing recognition of the diverse faith backgrounds of both staff and inmates in the correctional system.

In conclusion, the resolution of Imam Edrees Bridges' lawsuit marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing fight for religious equality within institutional settings, reinforcing the necessity for policies that respect the rights of all individuals, regardless of their faith.

Hijacking Trump's Religious Liberty Council: A Critical Examination

The establishment of President Trump's Religious Liberty Council has sparked controversy as many believe it prioritizes the interests of specific religious groups over the broader principles of religious freedom. Critics argue that the council's activities may lead to discrimination under the guise of protecting religious liberty, raising concerns about its implications for vulnerable communities.

New Mexico Faith Leaders Seek Political Engagement Amid Partisanship

In the politically charged landscape shaped by recent events, female faith leaders in New Mexico are prioritizing political engagement over partisan divides. They advocate for community involvement and aim to address critical issues like social justice, education, and healthcare, fostering unity rather than division.

Dueling National Prayer Breakfasts Highlight Immigration Policy Divide

The recent National Prayer Breakfasts in Washington showcased a stark divide in religious and political views, particularly regarding President Trump's immigration policies. While Trump emphasized his administration's achievements and criticized his opponents, the contrasting event at the Capitol focused on unity and reflection on scripture.

Trump Celebrates Religious Achievements at National Prayer Breakfast

At the National Prayer Breakfast, Donald Trump highlighted his administration's achievements concerning religious liberty and criticized political opponents. He announced a new initiative to rededicate America to God and emphasized his commitment to supporting conservative Christian values.

Senate Bill 11 Deadline Approaching: Schools Decide on Prayer Periods

Texas school boards face a March 1 deadline to decide on implementing Senate Bill 11, which allows optional periods for prayer and religious study in schools. The bill has sparked significant debate among educators and faith leaders regarding its implications for student rights and religious freedom.