Trump Calls for Big Tech to Cover AI Power Costs

Jan 14, 2026, 2:38 AM

Hover over text to view sources

President Donald Trump has recently targeted the energy consumption of data centers, urging major tech companies to bear the costs associated with their AI infrastructure. In a post on Truth Social, Trump emphasized that he does not want American consumers to "pick up the tab" for the power consumption of these facilities, which he described as essential to the US maintaining its leadership in artificial intelligence (AI) technology.

Trump's comments come as Microsoft announced a "Community-First AI Infrastructure" initiative, which includes a commitment to ensure that its data centers do not increase electricity prices for local residents. The company plans to work with utilities to set rates that cover the costs of serving its facilities, thereby preventing these expenses from being passed on to consumers. Microsoft’s vice chair, Brad Smith, has been actively engaging with lawmakers to promote this approach, which aims to alleviate public concerns about rising utility bills due to the demands of AI data centers.

The rapid expansion of AI technologies has raised alarms about the strain on the national electricity grid. As data centers proliferate, they are projected to consume a significant amount of energy—potentially as much as 300 terawatt-hours annually by 2028, enough to power over 28 million households. This surge in demand is already contributing to rising electricity prices, with some states experiencing increases of up to 36% in recent months.

Local communities have expressed concerns not only about electricity costs but also about the environmental impact of these data centers. The heavy water usage required for cooling these facilities has led to fears of depleted local water supplies, particularly in areas already facing water stress. For instance, data centers in regions like Arizona have been criticized for their substantial water consumption, which can exacerbate existing shortages for residents and farmers.

In response to these challenges, tech companies are exploring various strategies to mitigate their environmental footprint. For example, some firms are investing in on-site generation and storage solutions to reduce their reliance on the grid during peak demand periods. However, these measures are often seen as temporary fixes rather than long-term solutions to the underlying issues of energy consumption and environmental impact.

The political implications of Trump's stance are significant, especially with the upcoming midterm elections. His message resonates with voters who are increasingly concerned about the cost of living and the impact of rising utility bills on their households. By positioning himself as a defender of consumers against the costs associated with the AI boom, Trump aims to shift the blame away from his administration and onto the tech companies that are driving this expansion.

As the debate over who should bear the costs of AI infrastructure continues, the challenge remains for both the government and tech companies to find a balance that addresses the needs of local communities while fostering innovation. The push for a sustainable approach to AI development is critical, as the current trajectory suggests that without significant changes, the environmental and economic consequences could be severe. The future of AI in the US will depend on how effectively these challenges are managed in the coming years.

In conclusion, Trump's call for Big Tech to "pay their own way" reflects a growing awareness of the complexities surrounding the energy demands of AI technologies. As the industry evolves, it will be essential for tech companies to engage with local communities and regulators to ensure that their growth does not come at the expense of consumers or the environment. The path forward will require innovative solutions and a commitment to responsible energy use in the face of an expanding digital landscape.

Tech Investor Proposes Alternatives to California's Wealth Tax Debate

As California's proposed wealth tax for billionaires sparks debate, tech investor David Friedberg suggests alternative revenue-raising strategies. He highlights the loopholes in current tax systems and proposes taxing capital gains on borrowed assets as a more effective solution.

US Judge Questions Legality of Trump's $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee

A federal judge expressed skepticism during a hearing regarding the US Chamber of Commerce's challenge to President Trump's $100,000 fee for H-1B visa applications. The judge questioned the authority of the president to impose such a fee and suggested the Chamber might focus on lobbying Congress instead of litigation.

Trump Signs Order to Finalize TikTok Sale at $14 Billion Valuation

President Trump signed an executive order to finalize the sale of TikTok's US operations at a $14 billion valuation, addressing national security concerns. The deal involves US and global investors, with ByteDance retaining limited control, while experts question algorithm oversight and valuation discrepancies.

ByteDance to Retain 50% of TikTok US Profits in Trump Deal

ByteDance, TikTok's parent company, will likely retain 50% of the app's US profits under a Trump-backed deal, despite ceding majority ownership to US investors. The valuation of TikTok's US unit has sparked debate, with officials citing $14 billion but analysts calling it undervalued. Legal and political tensions remain unresolved as the deal navigates congressional and regulatory hurdles.

France and Germany Reject Trump's Threats on EU Tech Legislation

France and Germany have denounced US President Donald Trump's threats to impose tariffs on countries with digital taxes, asserting the EU's sovereign right to regulate technology. Both nations warned of retaliation if Washington attempts to coerce them into changing their digital regulations.