White House Fires Newly Appointed U.S. Attorney Donald Kinsella

Feb 13, 2026, 2:34 AM
Image for article White House Fires Newly Appointed U.S. Attorney Donald Kinsella

Hover over text to view sources

Donald Kinsella, who was recently appointed as the US Attorney for the Northern District of New York, was dismissed by the White House mere hours after being sworn in. This abrupt firing has sparked discussions regarding the balance of power between the executive branch and the judiciary, particularly concerning the appointment and removal of federal prosecutors.
Kinsella, a seasoned attorney with over 50 years of legal experience, received his appointment from a panel of federal judges following the disqualification of former US Attorney John Sarcone III, who was deemed to have served unlawfully. The judges' decision was based on a ruling that the Justice Department had improperly extended Sarcone’s tenure beyond the legally mandated 120 days for acting US Attorneys.
Just after his swearing-in ceremony, Kinsella learned of his termination through an email from Morgan DeWitt Snow, a deputy director of presidential personnel, which stated that the "president directed that I be removed," without further explanation. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche later reinforced the dismissal on social media, commenting that "Judges don't pick US Attorneys, [the president of the United States] does," referencing Article II of the Constitution.
The swift removal of Kinsella reflects a broader strategy by the Trump administration to assert control over US Attorney positions across the country, often replacing judicial appointments with more politically aligned individuals. This pattern raises critical questions about the extent of presidential authority in dismissing officials appointed by federal judges, with some legal experts asserting that Kinsella’s removal may have been unlawful.
Peter Shane, a constitutional law scholar, noted that the power to remove inferior officers, such as US Attorneys appointed by the judiciary, typically resides with the appointing authority—in this case, the judges. Conversely, other experts argue that federal law allows the president to remove any US Attorney.
Kinsella’s appointment was seen as a move to restore integrity to the office after controversies surrounding previous Trump appointees. His predecessor, Sarcone, faced legal challenges and was part of a group of Trump-appointed US Attorneys whose legitimacy had been questioned by federal courts.
The US District Court for the Northern District of New York defended Kinsella's appointment, emphasizing their authority under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution to appoint a US Attorney to fill a vacancy. They expressed gratitude for Kinsella's willingness to serve, citing his extensive experience in public service as beneficial for the community.
As the political landscape continues to evolve, Kinsella's firing highlights ongoing tensions between judicial independence and executive power, raising the stakes for future appointments and removals within the federal judiciary.
The White House's actions have drawn criticism from various quarters, with concerns about the implications for the rule of law and the independence of federal prosecutors. The situation underscores the importance of checks and balances within the US governmental system, particularly in relation to the influence of political considerations on judicial appointments.
As this story develops, it remains to be seen how the courts will respond to Kinsella's dismissal and whether there will be any legal challenges regarding the president's authority to remove judicial appointees.
The controversy surrounding Kinsella's firing is emblematic of broader issues at play in US politics, particularly regarding the interplay between the judiciary and the executive branch under the Trump administration.

Related articles

DHS Shutdown Looms as Lawmakers Depart Washington Amid ICE Dispute

As lawmakers leave Washington for a 10-day break, the Department of Homeland Security is on the brink of a shutdown due to unresolved disputes over immigration enforcement policies. With negotiations stalled, both parties remain far apart on critical demands regarding US Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

White House Fires Newly Appointed U.S. Attorney in Swift Move

In a rapid and controversial decision, the White House dismissed Donald Kinsella just hours after he was appointed as the US attorney for the Northern District of New York. The firing has raised questions about the authority of federal judges in appointing US attorneys and highlights ongoing tensions between the judiciary and the Trump administration.

House Speaker Denounces DOJ's Surveillance of Lawmakers' Epstein Document Review

House Speaker Mike Johnson has criticized the Justice Department for monitoring lawmakers' search histories during their review of unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files. This condemnation follows the revelation that the DOJ tracked specific searches made by Representative Pramila Jayapal, raising concerns over separation of powers and the integrity of congressional oversight.

Understanding RINO: Trump's Criticism of Oklahoma's Stitt

The term 'RINO' or 'Republican in Name Only' has resurfaced in political discourse, particularly after former President Trump criticized Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt at a recent National Governors Association dinner. This article explores the implications of the RINO label and the ongoing tensions within the Republican Party.

Trump's Political Retaliation in Colorado Sparks Outrage Among Democrats

Democratic lawmakers in Colorado are accusing former President Trump of using political retribution tactics during the ongoing government shutdown. They claim his administration's actions are targeting key programs and federal employees, raising concerns about the legality and humanitarian impact of these measures.