Recent surveys reveal that many Americans are increasingly disillusioned with the current state of the economy under President Trump, with a significant number wishing for the economic conditions seen during Biden's presidency. Polls show that Trump's handling of economic issues has led to heightened dissatisfaction among voters.

## Trump's Economy Leaves Americans Longing for Biden's Policies

As President Donald Trump continues to promote his economic achievements, a growing number of Americans are expressing nostalgia for the economic policies of his predecessor, Joe Biden.

According to a recent Harvard CAPS/Harris survey, more than half of US voters believe the economy is worse under Trump than it was under Biden, with 62% attributing the current economic struggles to Trump's policies rather than Biden's.

Trump has long criticized Biden's economic record, labeling it a "disaster" and a "catastrophe." Yet, recent polling indicates that 65% of respondents feel Trump's policies have worsened economic conditions, the highest disapproval rate for his administration to date.

This sentiment suggests that many voters are re-evaluating the economic landscape and find themselves wishing for the stability they associate with Biden's tenure.

Despite Trump's assertions that the economy is thriving, public perception tells a different story.

A CNN report highlights that 72% of Americans disapprove of Trump's handling of inflation, surpassing Biden's disapproval rate of 68%.

Furthermore, Trump’s approval for managing the economy sits at a mere 31%, a stark contrast to Biden's past ratings.

The economic landscape has shifted significantly since Trump assumed office.

Analysts note that job creation has slowed and the unemployment rate has increased.

Dean Baker, a senior fellow at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, recently emphasized that the economy had been strong at the end of 2024, with inflation beginning to decline after a post-COVID spike.

However, subsequent tariff increases and geopolitical tensions have contributed to rising prices, undermining any progress made during Biden's presidency.

While Trump's administration claims to have improved economic conditions, many small businesses are struggling to keep up.

Reports indicate that small businesses have cut over 43,000 jobs in the last year due to failed policies, which some attribute to Trump's approach to economic management.

These statistics paint a bleak picture, suggesting that the current administration's strategies may be exacerbating the issues faced by American workers.

Moreover, the debate surrounding inflation has intensified.

Critics argue that Trump's tariffs and regulatory choices have fueled inflation, with estimates suggesting a potential rise in consumer prices as high as 2.3% due to his policies.

In contrast, Biden's administration had been working to lower inflation rates, a fact that is often overlooked in the current political discourse.

Trump's economic narrative seems to collide with the reality faced by many Americans, who are increasingly vocal about their dissatisfaction.

In light of rising prices for essential goods and services, the public is beginning to recognize that the economic conditions they are experiencing today differ significantly from the pre-pandemic era, which many attribute to Biden's policies.

The apparent longing for Biden's economic management highlights a significant challenge for Trump as he attempts to position himself for future elections.

If public sentiment continues to tilt towards a preference for the economic policies of the previous administration, it could have profound implications for Trump's re-election campaign.

Many voters appear ready to pivot back to the "halcyon days" of Biden's presidency, as Trump's economic strategies come under increasing scrutiny.

In conclusion, as the economic landscape shifts and public opinion evolves, it becomes increasingly clear that a substantial number of Americans are missing the economic stability they associate with Biden's administration.

The road ahead for Trump may be fraught with challenges as he seeks to convince voters that his approach is the right path forward for the nation's economy.

With mounting evidence of dissatisfaction, it remains to be seen how Trump will address these growing concerns among the electorate.

Trump's Economy Leaves Americans Longing for Biden's Policies

trump-s-economy-leaves-americans-longing-for-biden-s-policies

Recent polling indicates that many Americans are increasingly nostalgic for Joe Biden's economic policies as dissatisfaction with Donald Trump's handling of the economy grows. A significant majority now believe the economy has worsened under Trump's leadership, leading to calls for a return to the previous administration's policies.

## Americans Long for Biden's Economy Amid Trump's Struggles

As the 2024 election unfolds, a surprising sentiment appears to be taking hold among American voters: many are missing the economic policies of Joe Biden.

A recent Harvard CAPS/Harris survey revealed that over half of US voters believe the economy has worsened under President Donald Trump compared to Biden's tenure.

This striking shift in public opinion underscores the challenges Trump faces as he attempts to navigate his second term.

Polling data indicates that 62% of respondents attribute the current economic difficulties to Trump's policies, rather than Biden's administration.

In a revealing CNN report published on April 1, it was noted that 65% of those surveyed felt that Trump's economic policies have exacerbated the situation, marking the highest level of disapproval Trump has received during his presidency.

Americans are increasingly concerned about inflation and the overall cost of living.

The same CNN poll showed a 72% disapproval rate for Trump's handling of inflation, surpassing Biden's disapproval ratings during his presidency.

Furthermore, 76% disapprove of Trump's management of gas prices, indicating widespread dissatisfaction with his economic stewardship.

The economic landscape has become a major issue for Trump, who previously capitalized on voters' frustrations with Biden during the last election cycle.

As the cost of living continues to rise, many voters, including some who previously supported Trump, are expressing disillusionment.

The PBS News/NPR/Marist poll highlights that 57% of Americans disapprove of Trump's economic performance, which could significantly impact his approval ratings moving forward.

Economic analysts have pointed out that the current inflationary environment is partly a result of Trump's policies, including tariffs and other measures that have contributed to rising costs for consumers.

Dean Baker, a senior fellow at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, noted that while Biden's economic policies showed signs of strength by the end of 2024, Trump's approach has led to a slowdown in job creation and a rise in unemployment.

Compounding these issues, Trump's administration has faced criticism for failing to stabilize prices and for dismissing concerns about affordability as a "con job" by Democrats.

This has further alienated voters who are struggling with rising costs, including food and healthcare, which remain pressing issues for many Americans.

The political landscape is shifting as many voters express a preference for the Democratic Party on economic issues, with 40% believing Democrats would handle the economy better than Republicans.

This marks a significant turnaround from previous years when Republicans held a substantial advantage in economic matters.

In light of these developments, Trump's assertion that he was elected due to his understanding of Biden's economic failures is increasingly challenged by the reality on the ground.

Voters are not only recalling the economic conditions under Biden but are also recognizing the shortcomings of Trump's current policies.

As the midterm elections approach, Trump's ability to turn around public perception regarding the economy will be crucial.

The dissatisfaction among voters, particularly independents and moderate Republicans, could pose a significant threat to his party's prospects in upcoming elections.

In summary, as Americans grapple with economic pressures, many are beginning to long for the days of Biden's administration, highlighting the precarious position Trump finds himself in.

With polling indicating a strong desire for change, the coming months will be critical for both Trump and the Republican Party in addressing the economic concerns that now dominate voters' minds.

Americans Long for Biden's Economy Amid Trump's Struggles

americans-long-for-biden-s-economy-amid-trump-s-struggles

Deutsche Bank's economists tested the prevailing belief that AI could reduce inflation by consulting leading AI systems. Surprisingly, the robots indicated that AI is more likely to raise inflation, driven by increased demand in AI investments, than to bring about significant disinflation.

## Deutsche Bank's AI Experiment Reveals Surprising Inflation Insights

Deutsche Bank has recently drawn attention by questioning whether artificial intelligence (AI) could help resolve the economy's inflation challenges.

Their economists, led by chief US economist Matthew Luzzetti, posed this question directly to various AI systems, including their own proprietary tool, dbLumina, OpenAI's ChatGPT-5.2, and Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.6, yielding unexpected results.

The prevailing consensus among investors and economists is that AI serves as a disinflationary force, suggesting that it can replace costly human labor, enhance productivity, and reduce barriers for new businesses.

However, the AI models responded with skepticism.

All three systems indicated that the most probable outcome for inflation is minimal impact, with a surprising consensus that AI could actually raise inflation rather than lower it.

At the one-year horizon, each AI tool assigned higher probabilities for AI raising inflation compared to meaningfully reducing it.

For instance, dbLumina estimated a 40% chance that AI would contribute to inflation, while only predicting a 5% chance for a significant decline.

Claude and ChatGPT followed suit with similar assessments, highlighting a more cautious outlook than that presented by some analysts.

The primary concern identified by the AI models is the booming investment in AI technology itself.

The demand for data centers, rising semiconductor usage, and increased electricity consumption from AI workloads are all contributing factors that can lead to upward pressure on prices.

As these demands grow, they may negate the disinflationary effects that many expect from AI integration into the economy.

Luzzetti's team noted that the models' findings present a more moderate view than that of some financial analysts, who predict dire consequences such as a potential "white-collar recession." This scenario posits that AI could decimate the consumer base by automating jobs, leading to mass unemployment and reduced consumer spending.

In a thought experiment, some have imagined a future where AI leads to a phenomenon termed "ghost GDP," where economic growth is inflated by AI, yet household incomes dwindle due to job losses.

Despite these concerns, the actual adoption of AI technologies remains considerably lower than their theoretical capabilities.

A study from Anthropic found that while AI tools could automate a vast majority of tasks in high-paying fields, actual implementation is still only a fraction of that potential.

If AI eventually closes this gap, it could lead to significant downward pressure on wages and service costs, although current observations indicate no systematic rise in unemployment related to AI adoption.

Deutsche Bank's economists caution that if AI itself misjudges its inflationary impact, it could necessitate a reevaluation of how transformative AI is expected to be for sectors requiring complex knowledge work, such as forecasting.

They suggest that markets may be prematurely pricing in the disinflationary effects of AI without accounting for the actual trends occurring in the economy.

In conclusion, the response from AI regarding its potential impact on inflation underscores the complexity of the issue.

While AI is often heralded as a transformative technology, its immediate effects on inflation may be more nuanced than previously believed.

The consensus among the AI models suggests that the road to meaningful economic changes through AI integration may be longer and more uncertain than optimistic forecasts imply.

The machines' answer to their own economic legacy seems to be clear: it’s complicated.

Deutsche Bank's AI Experiment Reveals Surprising Inflation Insights

deutsche-bank-s-ai-experiment-reveals-surprising-inflation-insights

Recent polls show President Trump's approval ratings have plummeted to 39%, coinciding with rising inflation concerns among voters. As 60% of respondents blame him for the economic situation, calls for prioritizing price reduction grow louder, raising questions about the Republican party's prospects in upcoming elections.

## Trump's Approval Ratings Dwindle Amid Inflation Concerns

Recent polling data indicates a significant decline in President Donald Trump's approval ratings, now at just 39%, the lowest since the aftermath of the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol.

This drop comes as inflation continues to be a pressing concern for many Americans, with nearly 60% of voters blaming Trump and congressional Republicans for the current economic situation.

The NPR/PBS News/Marist poll conducted from November 10-13 reveals that Trump's handling of inflation is widely criticized, with 61% of respondents expressing little to no confidence in his leadership.

The survey highlights a broader discontent with both major political parties, as 80% of respondents reported a lack of confidence in Congress and significant portions of the electorate view both parties as disconnected from the needs of everyday Americans.

A critical aspect of this discontent is the rising cost of living.

Approximately 54% of US adults categorize the cost of groceries as a major source of stress, reflecting the financial strain on households.

This concern is echoed in the poll, where 57% believe lowering prices should be Trump's top priority, far surpassing issues like immigration, which garnered only 16% support.

Despite the political fallout from inflation, Trump's base remains largely supportive, with 9-in-10 Republicans continuing to approve of his job performance.

However, this approval does not extend to his handling of economic issues, as only 36% of US adults approve of his economic management, a figure that remains stagnant in light of rising inflation and uncertainty.

Trump's use of tariffs as a protectionist trade policy has also faced criticism for exacerbating inflation.

Economists warn that proposed tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China could increase costs for American families significantly, potentially by thousands of dollars annually.

This is particularly concerning given that 78% of voters recently identified inflation as a moderate or severe hardship.

The political implications of these inflationary pressures are noteworthy.

Historical data suggests a strong correlation between inflation expectations and presidential approval ratings; when inflation rises, approval typically declines.

If current trends continue, Trump's approval ratings could face further erosion as voters increasingly link economic hardship to his administration.

In preparation for the 2026 midterm elections, the landscape appears more favorable for Democrats, who currently hold a 14-point lead over Republicans in hypothetical congressional matchups.

This shift reflects a significant reversal from previous years and indicates that economic issues, particularly inflation, may be pivotal in determining voter behavior in the coming elections.

With inflation remaining a top concern for voters, the pressure mounts on Trump and the Republican Party to address these issues effectively.

As public dissatisfaction grows, both parties must navigate the complex interplay of inflation and approval ratings to regain voter trust and confidence in their leadership.

In conclusion, Trump's declining approval ratings amid rising inflation highlight a critical juncture for his administration and the Republican Party.

With voters increasingly linking their economic struggles to political leadership, the upcoming elections may serve as a referendum on how well both parties are addressing the pressing issues of the day.

Trump's Approval Ratings Dwindle Amid Inflation Concerns

trump-s-approval-ratings-dwindle-amid-inflation-concerns

Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, has warned that if the ongoing war in Iran extends beyond a year, it could lead to a significant global recession. His insights highlight the critical relationship between geopolitical conflicts and economic stability, particularly concerning energy prices.

## Larry Fink Warns: Prolonged Iran War Could Trigger Global Recession

Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, the world's largest asset management firm with $14 trillion in assets under management, has recently expressed grave concerns regarding the ongoing conflict in Iran.

He stated that if the war continues for more than a year, it could precipitate a global recession, emphasizing the profound implications for the world economy that arise from fluctuating energy prices due to geopolitical tensions.

In an exclusive interview, Fink outlined two potential scenarios resulting from the conflict.

The optimistic scenario envisions a resolution where Iran reintegrates into the global community, enabling the country to resume its oil exports.

Such an outcome could lead to a significant drop in oil prices, potentially hitting around $40 a barrel.

Conversely, if the Iranian regime persists in its hostility, oil prices could soar above $150, leading to severe economic repercussions worldwide.

Fink noted that the consequences of elevated oil prices could be dire, triggering a "steep and stark" global recession.

He pointed out that the current situation in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical shipping route for oil, remains tenuous, significantly affecting global energy supply.

If the conflict continues, Fink warned that many countries would suffer, underscoring the interconnectedness of modern economies and their vulnerability to regional conflicts.

The market's response to the ongoing crisis has been mixed, with initial optimism among investors suggesting that the war would have a short duration.

However, as the conflict drags on, concerns are growing about its long-term impact on energy prices and, by extension, global economic stability.

Fink's insights reflect a broader anxiety in financial circles, where there is a palpable fear that continued unrest could lead to a market downturn.

He stated that the longer the conflict lasts, the more likely it is that stock markets will experience significant declines due to changing circumstances rather than valuation issues.

Fink's position as a central figure in finance grants him a unique perspective on global economic trends.

His views are eagerly sought by policymakers and business leaders alike.

He has previously noted that the interconnected nature of global markets means that disturbances in one region can have ripple effects worldwide.

This was evident during the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent supply chain disruptions that affected many sectors globally.

Furthermore, the financial repercussions of the war in Iran are compounded by other geopolitical tensions, including the ongoing crisis in Ukraine and the historical context of US-Iran relations.

Fink has emphasized the need for a balanced approach, advocating for policies that promote stability and economic growth, while also addressing the underlying issues of international relations and trade.

He has expressed optimism about the potential for constructive dialogue and resolution, stating that the world can benefit from a more secure and cooperative Iran.

As the situation unfolds, investors and analysts will be closely monitoring developments in Iran and their potential impact on oil prices and global economic health.

Fink's insights serve as a reminder of the delicate balance between geopolitical stability and economic prosperity, highlighting how quickly market sentiment can shift in response to international conflicts.

The coming months will be crucial in determining whether the global economy can navigate these turbulent waters without succumbing to recessionary pressures.

In conclusion, Larry Fink's warning regarding the potential for a global recession stemming from the prolonged conflict in Iran underscores the vital relationship between geopolitical events and economic stability.

As the world watches closely, the hope remains that diplomatic solutions will prevail, allowing for a more stable and prosperous future for global markets and economies alike.

Larry Fink Warns: Prolonged Iran War Could Trigger Global Recession

larry-fink-warns-prolonged-iran-war-could-trigger-global-recession

Despite a challenging start to 2026 for major stock indices, the Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF stands out by remaining flat year-to-date. This performance is attributed to its focus on small-cap stocks that are less affected by global tensions and offer diversified growth opportunities.

## Vanguard ETF Outpaces Major Indices in 2026 Amid Economic Turmoil

The US stock market is experiencing significant challenges in 2026, with major indices like the S&P 500, Nasdaq-100, and Dow Jones Industrial Average facing year-to-date declines exceeding 5% due to geopolitical tensions and rising oil prices.

However, the Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (NASDAQ: VTWO) has managed to remain flat, indicating its resilience in the current economic climate.

The Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 index, which is composed of approximately 2,000 of the smallest publicly traded companies in the United States.

This diversification across various sectors—particularly healthcare, industrials, and financials—has shielded the ETF from the volatility affecting larger stocks that dominate indices like the S&P 500.

In fact, the top 10 holdings in the Vanguard ETF account for only 5.6% of its total value, contrasting sharply with the S&P 500, where a significant portion is concentrated in technology stocks.

Investors are increasingly recognizing the potential of small-cap stocks, which can deliver remarkable returns.

For instance, Bloom Energy, one of the ETF's top holdings, has seen its stock price soar by 500% over the past year as demand for its clean energy solutions surges.

This trend highlights the ETF's capacity to capitalize on emerging sectors, particularly as firms seek alternatives to traditional energy sources amidst rising costs.

### Market Trends and Economic Indicators

As we delve deeper into 2026, several market trends are emerging that could affect the performance of the Vanguard ETF.

Economic forecasts suggest a potential recovery in growth, fueled by easing fiscal and monetary policies.

Analysts predict that both developed and emerging market equities will outperform other asset classes, including cash and bonds, with growth expectations rising across the board.

The ongoing advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) are also expected to play a critical role in shaping market dynamics.

The rapid adoption of AI technologies is driving capital expenditures, particularly in the US, which is poised to benefit significantly from this trend as it is home to many leading tech firms.

Thus, the Vanguard ETF, with its exposure to smaller companies, may be well-positioned to take advantage of this growth as these firms increasingly adopt AI tools to enhance productivity and profit margins.

The Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF’s diverse sector allocation is crucial in the current economic landscape.

With small-cap stocks often overlooked, their potential for growth can be especially pronounced during periods of economic recovery.

This ETF's balanced approach minimizes the risks associated with heavy reliance on a few large companies, making it an attractive option for investors seeking stability amidst market turbulence.

In conclusion, while major indices struggle with declines, the Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF stands out in 2026 as an effective investment option.

Its focus on small-cap stocks, diversified sector exposure, and alignment with emerging growth trends position it favorably in a shifting economic landscape.

As market conditions evolve, the ETF's ability to deliver steady returns could prove invaluable for investors navigating the complexities of the current financial environment.

Vanguard ETF Outpaces Major Indices in 2026 Amid Economic Turmoil

vanguard-etf-outpaces-major-indices-in-2026-amid-economic-turmoil

As inflation and rising oil prices elevate recession risks, experts suggest proactive financial strategies for Americans. Building emergency savings and evaluating credit options are essential steps. Understanding economic indicators can also help consumers navigate potential downturns.

## Preparing for a Potential U.S. Recession: Key Strategies

As inflation continues to strain American wallets, the risk of a recession looms larger.

Recent economic analysis indicates that the probability of the United States entering a recession within the next year is alarmingly high, with estimates reaching up to 49% due to surging oil prices and inflationary pressures related to the ongoing conflict in Iran.

In March, Brent crude oil prices soared to $117 a barrel, and sustained high oil prices could exacerbate an already fragile economic landscape.

According to Matthew Martin, senior US economist at Oxford Economics, such pressures could lead to reduced consumer spending and ultimately trigger a recession if oil prices remain elevated.

### Economic Implications of Rising Oil Prices

The ripple effects of high oil prices are significant.

Consumers facing increased costs at the pump are likely to cut back on spending in other areas, which could lead to reduced demand for goods and services.

This decline in demand can prompt businesses to slow hiring or even lay off employees, further compounding economic troubles.

Martin warns that if high-income earners—who have been pivotal in driving consumer spending—begin to cut back, middle- and low-income households will feel the pinch of rising prices even more acutely.

This could create a "storm" that the economy may struggle to weather.

### Preparing for the Possibility of a Recession

In light of these risks, financial experts emphasize the importance of preparation.

Miklos Ringbauer, a certified public accountant based in Los Angeles, advises individuals to bolster their emergency funds.

The traditional recommendation of saving three to six months' worth of expenses may not suffice during a recession.

Instead, he suggests aiming for a year’s worth of savings to buffer against prolonged unemployment.

For those who may need to rely on credit cards, reviewing the interest rates associated with their cards is crucial.

Opting for cards with lower introductory rates can make a significant difference in managing debt during tough economic times.

### Consumer Strategies for Navigating Economic Challenges

While consumers cannot control external factors like gas prices, they can adopt strategies to mitigate their financial burdens.

Ringbauer highlights the value of using apps like GasBuddy to track fuel prices and find cheaper options, as well as taking advantage of membership stores that offer discounted gas.

Moreover, he suggests that individuals should act on favorable deals when they arise, as waiting may lead to higher prices in the future.

This proactive approach can be particularly beneficial in a shifting economic landscape where foreclosures and job losses may present new opportunities.

For many, the question remains: what defines a recession?

The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) defines a recession as a significant decline in economic activity that lasts more than a few months, characterized by indicators such as declining real GDP, payroll employment, and consumer spending.

Determining when the US is officially in a recession is the responsibility of the NBER's Business Cycle Dating Committee, which evaluates various economic factors before making an announcement.

Historically, the NBER has taken months to confirm a recession, often revealing the downturn only after it has already begun.

As the US economy faces potential recession risks due to rising oil prices and inflation, individuals must take proactive steps to safeguard their financial wellbeing.

Building emergency funds, scrutinizing credit options, and staying informed about economic indicators can empower consumers to navigate these uncertain times more effectively.

The advice from financial experts underscores the necessity of preparedness in the face of economic challenges, reinforcing the idea that proactive financial management can help mitigate the impacts of a recession.

Preparing for a Potential U.S. Recession: Key Strategies

preparing-for-a-potential-u-s-recession-key-strategies

As economic uncertainty looms, experts advise investors to integrate artificial intelligence into their strategies and consider the implications of Federal Reserve policies. With concerns about inflation, labor market dynamics, and geopolitical risks, understanding these factors is crucial for navigating today's volatile market.

## The Fed, AI, and Economic Uncertainty: Insights for Investors

As economic uncertainty continues to shape the financial landscape, investors must adapt their strategies to navigate the complexities of the current market.

Key discussions from experts at the MIT Sloan Investment Conference highlighted the interplay between artificial intelligence (AI), Federal Reserve policies, and broader economic conditions that are vital for investors to understand.

Gary Gensler, a former SEC chair and current professor at MIT Sloan, emphasized the importance of having an AI thesis for investors.

He noted that without a clear understanding of AI's potential impact on productivity, labor markets, and market dynamics, investors risk missing significant opportunities.

Gensler pointed out a troubling gap between capital expenditures on AI infrastructure, projected to reach $500 billion to $600 billion, and the revenue generated from AI services, which was estimated at only $50 billion last year.

Topic

Finance

Recent articles:

Americans Long for Biden's Economy Amid Trump's Struggles

Deutsche Bank's AI Experiment Reveals Surprising Inflation Insights

Trump's Approval Ratings Dwindle Amid Inflation Concerns

Larry Fink Warns: Prolonged Iran War Could Trigger Global Recession

Vanguard ETF Outpaces Major Indices in 2026 Amid Economic Turmoil

Preparing for a Potential U.S. Recession: Key Strategies

The Fed, AI, and Economic Uncertainty: Insights for Investors

Understanding Recessions: Insights from a Trump White House Economist

Powell Signals Fed's Cautious Approach Amid War and Inflation Concerns

Fed Chair Powell: No Contagion Risk in Private Credit, Rates in Good Place

Wall Street Anticipates TACO as Iran Conflict Escalates

Fed Chair Powell Discusses Inflation and Job Market Challenges at Harvard

Trump's Stock Market Strategy: TACO Playbook Returns Amid Iran Conflict

Tech CEOs Blame AI for Job Cuts: The Real Reasons Behind Layoffs

Senate Committee Set to Review Warsh's Nomination as Fed Chair

Navigating the Tech Landscape: My Strategy with Nvidia, Microsoft, and Meta

Trump's Economic Legacy: A Path to Bankruptcy for America

Meta and Social Media Stocks Plummet After Legal Setbacks

GOP Senators Warn Trump: Economic Instability Threatens Election Success