The Trump administration is evaluating a land exchange that would provide SpaceX with 775 acres of the Lower Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife Refuge in Texas. In return, SpaceX would offer 692 acres of its own land, potentially impacting local wildlife habitats.

## Trump Administration Considers Land Exchange with SpaceX in Texas

The Trump administration is weighing a deal with SpaceX that would give Elon Musk's aerospace company 775 acres of the Lower Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife Refuge in Texas.

The reported exchange would involve SpaceX trading 692 acres of land it owns elsewhere in Cameron County, some of which is located 20 miles away from the refuge.

This land exchange aims to facilitate SpaceX's expansion of its rocket launch operations, a move that has raised concerns among critics regarding potential ecological damage and threats to nearby wildlife habitats.

A spokesperson for the Fish and Wildlife Service confirmed the potential deal, stating that the federal government is exploring an exchange that "advances long-term wildlife conservation" while aligning with the administration's goals of enhancing American innovation and economic competitiveness.

However, it remains unclear whether the deal would impose any requirements on SpaceX to take measures for wildlife preservation on the newly acquired land.

The Lower Rio Grande Valley Refuge is home to two endangered wild cat species, the ocelot and the jaguarundi, which could be affected by the expansion of SpaceX's operations.

SpaceX had previously engaged in a land swap agreement with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission in 2024 but later withdrew from that deal.

That earlier agreement would have allowed SpaceX to acquire 43 acres of Boca Chica State Park in exchange for 477 acres near the Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge.

The current proposal suggests that some of the land SpaceX would relinquish in the new exchange could be added to the Laguna Atascosa refuge, potentially benefiting local wildlife conservation efforts.

The presence of SpaceX in South Texas has become increasingly prominent, particularly with the establishment of a new city named Starbase, which is primarily populated by SpaceX employees.

This potential land exchange could represent another significant win for SpaceX, following a series of favorable developments over the past year.

In May, the Federal Aviation Administration granted SpaceX approval to increase the number of rocket launches in South Texas.

Additionally, in June, the Texas Legislature authorized the company to close a nearby beach for its launches, and in September, a judge dismissed a lawsuit against the FAA concerning the environmental impacts of a failed SpaceX rocket launch earlier in 2023.

As discussions continue regarding the land exchange, the implications for both SpaceX's operations and local wildlife conservation efforts remain a critical focus for stakeholders involved in the process.

Trump Administration Considers Land Exchange with SpaceX in Texas

trump-administration-considers-land-exchange-with-spacex-in-texas

Tossing apple cores out of car windows may seem harmless, but it poses significant risks to wildlife and the environment. This article explores the ecological consequences of this common practice, including wildlife fatalities, digestive issues for animals, and the potential introduction of non-native species.

## The Dangers of Throwing Apple Cores Out the Car Window

Many drivers may think that tossing an apple core out of their car window is a benign act, believing it to be biodegradable and harmless.

However, experts warn that this seemingly innocent action can have serious ecological consequences that affect both wildlife and human safety.

One of the primary concerns is that apple cores do not decompose quickly when discarded on roadsides.

According to Lauren Click, executive director of Let's Go Compost, proper decomposition requires specific conditions such as moisture, heat, and a rich microbial environment, which are rarely found along highways.

Instead, apple cores can persist for one to two months or longer, remaining a potential food source for wildlife during that time.

When animals begin to associate roadsides with easy meals, they are more likely to linger in these dangerous areas, increasing their risk of being struck by vehicles.

Kevin Jackson, founder of EXP Journeys, emphasizes that this behavior can lead to wildlife fatalities and create hazardous situations for drivers who may need to brake or swerve suddenly to avoid hitting an animal.

Moreover, apple cores can disrupt the natural diets of wildlife.

Many animals are not adapted to digest apples, which can lead to digestive issues or even choking hazards.

This is particularly concerning for species that may be drawn to the roadside in search of food, as they may consume items that are not suitable for their diets.

The introduction of apple seeds into the environment can also have unintended consequences.

If these seeds sprout, they can lead to the growth of non-native apple trees, which may crowd out native species and disrupt local ecosystems.

This ecological disruption can have far-reaching effects, altering the balance of local flora and fauna.

In addition to the ecological risks, throwing apple cores out of car windows can also be considered littering, which is illegal in many states.

For instance, Washington's health and safety laws define litter as any waste material disposed of improperly, including food scraps.

Penalties for littering can be severe, with fines ranging from $250 to $6,500 depending on the state and the amount of litter involved.

Furthermore, the act of littering can contribute to a broader culture of disregard for the environment.

If individuals justify throwing away biodegradable items like apple cores, they may be more likely to dismiss the importance of proper waste disposal in general.

In conclusion, while it may seem harmless to toss an apple core out of the car window, the practice poses significant risks to wildlife, disrupts local ecosystems, and can lead to legal consequences.

To protect both the environment and public safety, it is essential to dispose of food waste responsibly, ideally by composting or placing it in a trash bag for proper disposal.

By understanding the implications of our actions, we can contribute to a healthier planet and ensure the safety of both wildlife and human drivers alike.

The Dangers of Throwing Apple Cores Out the Car Window

the-dangers-of-throwing-apple-cores-out-the-car-window

Wildfire burn scars in Los Angeles significantly increase the risk of flooding and debris flows during heavy rainfall. The loss of vegetation and changes in soil properties make these areas particularly vulnerable, leading to rapid runoff and dangerous conditions.

## Wildfire Burn Scars Heighten Flooding Risks in Los Angeles

The aftermath of wildfires in Los Angeles has left the region with burn scars that pose a severe threat of flooding and debris flows during heavy rain events.

As the area braces for intense storms, officials are increasingly concerned about the potential for catastrophic flooding in these vulnerable zones.

Recent wildfires, such as the Eaton and Palisades fires, have stripped the landscape of vegetation, which normally helps absorb rainfall.

This loss transforms the soil into a water-repellent layer, making it behave similarly to pavement, where water cannot penetrate.

Consequently, even moderate rainfall can lead to rapid runoff and flash flooding, particularly in steep terrain.

The National Weather Service has issued warnings for excessive rainfall across Southern California, predicting that areas affected by recent wildfires are at heightened risk for debris flows and mudslides.

These debris flows can be extremely dangerous, moving with the speed of a freight train and carrying large amounts of sediment, rocks, and even vehicles down slopes.

In the wake of the Thomas Fire in 2018, a storm triggered debris flows in Montecito that resulted in 23 fatalities and extensive property damage.

This tragic event underscores the potential consequences of heavy rain on burn scars, where the combination of steep slopes and compromised soil stability creates a perfect storm for disaster.

The current weather patterns indicate that Southern California is facing a significant atmospheric river event, which is expected to bring prolonged periods of heavy rain.

Rainfall rates may exceed one inch per hour, particularly in higher elevations, leading to widespread flooding.

The National Weather Service has classified the risk of excessive rainfall as "High Risk," a designation that is rarely issued and indicates a serious threat to life and property.

Officials have implemented evacuation warnings in areas surrounding burn scars, urging residents to prepare for potential flooding and debris flows.

The Los Angeles County Department of Public Works has also mobilized resources, including swiftwater rescue teams and debris basins, to mitigate the impact of these storms.

The unique geography of Southern California, characterized by steep mountains and a high frequency of wildfires, exacerbates the risks associated with burn scars.

The combination of these factors means that even small amounts of rain can trigger dangerous conditions.

Experts emphasize the importance of preparedness in these areas.

Residents are advised to have evacuation plans in place and to stay informed about weather conditions.

The susceptibility to flash flooding is particularly acute in the first two years following a wildfire, making vigilance essential during this period.

As climate change continues to influence weather patterns, the frequency and intensity of both wildfires and subsequent rain events are expected to increase.

Studies suggest that the likelihood of major debris flows could rise significantly, further endangering communities near burn scars.

In conclusion, the intersection of wildfire burn scars and heavy rainfall presents a formidable challenge for Los Angeles.

As the region braces for potential flooding, the lessons learned from past disasters highlight the urgent need for preparedness and proactive measures to protect vulnerable communities.

Residents are reminded to heed evacuation orders and stay alert to changing weather conditions, as the risks associated with burn scars can escalate rapidly.

The time to act is now, as the consequences of inaction could be devastating.

Wildfire Burn Scars Heighten Flooding Risks in Los Angeles

wildfire-burn-scars-heighten-flooding-risks-in-los-angeles

Throwing apple cores out of car windows may seem harmless, but it poses significant risks to wildlife and the environment. This practice can lead to dangerous wildlife-human interactions, attract animals to roads, and disrupt local ecosystems.

## The Dangers of Tossing Apple Cores Out the Car Window

However, experts warn that this seemingly innocent action can have serious consequences for wildlife and the environment.

According to Lauren Click, executive director of Let's Go Compost, organic materials like apple cores require specific conditions—moisture, heat, and a rich microbial environment—to break down effectively.

Roadsides typically lack these conditions, causing apple cores to persist for one to two months or longer, which is much longer than many people expect.

Moreover, tossing food waste like apple cores can attract wildlife to roadsides, increasing the risk of animal-vehicle collisions.

Kevin Jackson, a wildlife expert, notes that when animals begin to associate roads with easy meals, they are more likely to linger in these dangerous areas.

This behavior not only endangers the animals but also poses risks to drivers who may need to brake or swerve to avoid hitting them.

In addition to the immediate dangers posed to wildlife, apple cores can disrupt local ecosystems.

If the seeds from the cores sprout, they may introduce non-native apple trees into the area, which can outcompete native species and disrupt the local flora and fauna.

James Ian, founder of Parks Collecting, emphasizes that such disruptions can have cascading effects on the entire ecosystem, potentially leading to a decline in biodiversity.

Another significant issue is the potential for wildlife-human interactions to become dangerous.

Animals that begin to see humans as a source of food may change their natural behaviors, leading to increased aggression and conflicts.

This can result in park rangers needing to euthanize animals for public safety, a tragic outcome of what may have started as a harmless act of tossing an apple core out the window.

Legally, tossing an apple core can also be considered littering in many jurisdictions.

For instance, Washington state law defines litter as any waste material that is illegally dumped, which includes food scraps like apple cores.

While the penalties for littering vary by state, they can be significant, with fines ranging from hundreds to thousands of dollars for improper disposal of waste.

In light of these concerns, it is clear that the practice of throwing apple cores out of car windows is not as innocuous as it may seem.

Instead of contributing to roadside litter, individuals should consider more responsible disposal methods.

Keeping a small trash bag in the car for food scraps can help mitigate the risks associated with tossing organic waste out the window.

Ultimately, the best way to protect wildlife and the environment is to refrain from discarding any food waste, including apple cores, on roadsides.

By doing so, we can help ensure the safety of both animals and humans while preserving the delicate balance of our ecosystems.

In conclusion, while it may seem harmless to toss an apple core out the window, the potential consequences are far-reaching.

From attracting wildlife to roads to disrupting local ecosystems, the act of littering—even with biodegradable materials—can have significant negative impacts.

It is essential to be mindful of our actions and their effects on the environment and wildlife, promoting a culture of responsible waste disposal instead.

By understanding the implications of our choices, we can contribute to a healthier planet and safer roads for all.

The Dangers of Tossing Apple Cores Out the Car Window

the-dangers-of-tossing-apple-cores-out-the-car-window

President Trump's administration has denied Colorado's requests for major disaster declarations following the Elk and Lee fires and subsequent flooding. This decision has sparked accusations from state officials of political motivations behind the denial, as they seek federal aid to support recovery efforts.

## Trump Denies Colorado Disaster Aid, Accusations of Political Games Emerge

The Trump administration's recent denial of Colorado's requests for major disaster declarations has ignited a political firestorm, with state officials accusing the president of playing political games at the expense of disaster recovery efforts.

The requests were made in response to the Elk and Lee fires, as well as flooding that devastated parts of southwestern Colorado earlier this year.

Governor Jared Polis expressed his disappointment, stating that Coloradans affected by these disasters "deserve better than the political games President Trump is playing." He announced plans to appeal the decision, emphasizing the need for federal assistance to support recovery efforts in the state.

Under the Stafford Act, governors can request major disaster declarations when a disaster exceeds state capabilities.

The president has the sole discretion to grant these requests, which would unlock federal funds for recovery efforts.

However, the denial letters from the Trump administration did not provide specific reasons for the rejection, merely stating that federal assistance "is not warranted.".

The Elk and Lee fires, which burned tens of thousands of acres, resulted in significant damage, including the destruction of at least five homes.

The Lee Fire alone became the fourth largest wildfire in Colorado's history, burning over 137,000 acres before containment.

The state has already invested over $57 million in disaster response since July 2024, but officials warn that without federal support, local communities may struggle to recover.

US Senator Michael Bennet criticized the denial, calling it "unacceptable" and highlighting the urgent need for assistance in the wake of life-threatening flooding and historic wildfires.

Senator John Hickenlooper echoed these sentiments, stating, "This isn't a game.

These are people's lives." Both senators, along with Governor Polis, are committed to appealing the decision to secure the necessary federal aid.

The economic implications of the disaster are significant, particularly for the energy sector in Rio Blanco County, which relies heavily on natural gas production from the Piceance Basin.

Damage to local utility infrastructure has been estimated at over $24 million, threatening not only local economies but also energy security at a national level.

The county's commissioner expressed disappointment over the denial, emphasizing the challenges rural communities face when critical infrastructure is lost.

In addition to the wildfires, the flooding in Western Colorado has caused extensive damage to essential infrastructure, including drinking water and wastewater systems.

The flooding prompted evacuations and led to multiple boil-water advisories, highlighting the immediate need for federal assistance to support recovery efforts.

The Trump administration's decision to deny disaster aid has drawn parallels to similar actions taken in other Democratic-leaning states, where federal disaster funding requests have also been denied.

Lawmakers in these states have accused the administration of politicizing the disaster relief process, further fueling accusations of political motivations behind the denial of aid to Colorado.

As Colorado officials prepare to appeal the decision, they remain hopeful that the federal government will reconsider its stance and provide the necessary support for recovery efforts.

Governor Polis has called on the president to "reconsider these requests," emphasizing that the focus should be on helping Coloradans in need rather than engaging in political games.

The situation continues to evolve as state officials work to secure the federal assistance necessary to aid recovery efforts in the wake of these devastating disasters.

The resilience of Coloradans in the face of adversity remains a central theme as they navigate the challenges posed by the wildfires and flooding.

Trump Denies Colorado Disaster Aid, Accusations of Political Games Emerge

trump-denies-colorado-disaster-aid-accusations-of-political-games-emerge

Small-scale bioenergy is increasingly recognized as a vital component in addressing wildfire prevention, enhancing climate resilience, and reducing emissions. Programs like California's BioMAT support these initiatives, promoting sustainable practices that benefit both the environment and local communities.

## The Role of Small-Scale Bioenergy in Climate Resilience

Small-scale bioenergy is emerging as a critical tool in the fight against climate change, particularly in the context of wildfire prevention and emissions reduction.

Programs such as California's BioMAT (Biomass Market Adjusting Tariff) are designed to support these efforts, aligning with broader environmental goals set by state agencies.

The California Forest Carbon Plan, along with the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Natural Resources Agency, explicitly recognizes small-scale bioenergy as essential for enhancing climate resilience and improving air quality.

These agencies advocate for the continuation of BioMAT, which has been instrumental in promoting projects that mitigate wildfire risks and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

In Yuba County, for instance, the proposed Engeman Camptonville Green Energy facility aims to remove approximately 50,000 tons of hazardous forest material annually.

This initiative not only seeks to decrease open burning and wildfire emissions but also plans to generate 3 megawatts of renewable power.

Such projects are crucial as they build upon decades of forest restoration efforts, which have already secured over $100 million for landscape-scale thinning and restoration.

The potential benefits of small-scale bioenergy extend beyond immediate environmental impacts.

By providing safe disposal options for biomass, these projects can help communities manage hazardous materials effectively.

Ending programs like BioMAT could jeopardize these advancements, leaving communities vulnerable to the risks associated with unmanaged biomass.

Moreover, the increasing frequency and intensity of wildfires, exacerbated by climate change, highlight the urgent need for effective management strategies.

As global temperatures rise, the risks associated with wildfires are projected to escalate, leading to significant ecological and economic consequences.

Small-scale bioenergy initiatives can play a pivotal role in mitigating these risks by reducing fuel loads in forests and promoting healthier ecosystems.

In addition to wildfire prevention, small-scale bioenergy contributes to emissions reduction.

The combustion of biomass can be managed to produce energy with lower net carbon emissions compared to fossil fuels.

This transition is vital as the world seeks to meet climate targets and reduce reliance on carbon-intensive energy sources.

The integration of small-scale bioenergy into broader climate strategies also aligns with sustainable development goals.

By fostering local energy production, these initiatives can enhance energy security, create jobs, and stimulate economic growth in rural areas.

This multifaceted approach not only addresses environmental concerns but also supports community resilience in the face of climate change.

In conclusion, small-scale bioenergy is not merely an alternative energy source; it is a critical component of a comprehensive strategy to combat climate change, enhance wildfire resilience, and promote sustainable development.

As policymakers consider the future of programs like BioMAT, it is essential to recognize the significant benefits these initiatives provide to both the environment and local communities.

Strengthening and extending such programs will be vital in building a more resilient and sustainable future.

The Role of Small-Scale Bioenergy in Climate Resilience

the-role-of-small-scale-bioenergy-in-climate-resilience

A recent study reveals that climate change is responsible for a significant portion of wildfire emissions in the western United States. Researchers found that between 60% to 82% of the burned area in western forests since the early 1990s can be attributed to rising temperatures and increased aridity, highlighting the urgent need for effective land management strategies.

## Climate Change Drives Majority of Wildfire Emissions in Western US

A recent study published in the *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences* has highlighted the alarming impact of climate change on wildfire emissions in the western United States.

Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences found that climate change is responsible for 60% to 82% of the total burned area in western US forests since the early 1990s, with an average of 65% of total fire emissions attributed to these changes from 1997 to 2020.

The study, led by Loretta Mickley, a senior research fellow specializing in chemistry-climate interactions, utilized a combination of observations, machine learning algorithms, and extensive climate models to assess the relationship between climate change and wildfire behavior.

The findings indicate that nearly half of the most hazardous types of wildfire smoke, known as fine particulate matter (PM2.5), can be directly linked to climate change, accounting for 58% of the increase in this specific type of smoke pollution from 2010 to 2020.

The researchers mapped various ecosystems across the western United States, compiling decades of data on weather patterns, vegetation levels, and fire-affected areas.

Their analysis revealed that while pollution from industrial sources has decreased by approximately 44% since 1997, wildfire smoke has consistently increased, particularly in regions like northern California, Oregon, Washington, and Idaho, where climate-induced smoke constituted 44% to 66% of total PM2.5 levels from 2010 to 2020.

Mickley emphasized the importance of quantifying how climate change has exacerbated smoke exposure, stating, "Our goal was to spur efforts to think more deeply about how we manage land and wildfires in the western US" The study suggests that land managers should consider implementing counteractive strategies, such as prescribed burning, to mitigate the spread of catastrophic fires in the future.

The research also highlights the role of climate change in altering fire seasons and increasing fire intensity.

A study by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the University of California at Los Angeles found that human-caused climate change is now the dominant contributor to increased wildfire risk in the western US, with vapor pressure deficit (VPD) serving as a key indicator of fire susceptibility.

As temperatures rise and conditions become drier, the risk of wildfires is expected to increase significantly.

Projections indicate that even a modest annual temperature increase of just 1 °C could lead to a median burned area increase of up to 600% in certain forest types in the western US.

The implications of these findings are profound, as wildfires not only threaten ecosystems but also pose significant risks to human health and safety.

The toxic smoke produced by wildfires is linked to respiratory issues and other health problems, with millions of people exposed to hazardous air quality levels during fire seasons.

In light of these findings, the study calls for a reevaluation of land management practices and a greater emphasis on addressing greenhouse gas emissions.

The researchers are currently investigating how the legacy of fire suppression from the 20th century may have contributed to the current wildfire crisis, as the accumulation of underbrush and increased forest density have created more fuel for fires.

The urgency of addressing climate change and its impact on wildfires cannot be overstated.

As the frequency and intensity of wildfires continue to rise, it is crucial for policymakers, land managers, and communities to implement effective strategies to mitigate the risks associated with these devastating events.

In conclusion, the study underscores the critical need for a comprehensive approach to wildfire management that incorporates climate change considerations.

By understanding the relationship between climate change and wildfire emissions, stakeholders can better prepare for and respond to the growing threat of wildfires in the western United States.

Climate Change Drives Majority of Wildfire Emissions in Western US

climate-change-drives-majority-of-wildfire-emissions-in-western-us

A group of California lawmakers has denounced President Trump's plan to increase water pumping to Central Valley farmlands, arguing it poses significant risks to water availability, disrupts state-federal cooperation, and threatens native fish species. Led by Rep. John Garamendi, the legislators assert that the plan prioritizes political interests over environmental and community needs.

## Lawmakers Criticize Trump's Water Pumping Plan for California

A plan by the Trump administration to increase water pumping from California's Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta has sparked strong opposition from a coalition of Democratic lawmakers.

John Garamendi (D-Walnut Grove), the group argues that the proposal threatens water availability for millions of Californians, disrupts essential state-federal cooperation, and endangers native fish populations in the Delta.

The US Bureau of Reclamation's initiative, which aims to pump more water to Central Valley farmlands, has been described by Garamendi as prioritizing "partisan politics over California's communities and farmers." He emphasized that pumping additional water during a period of worsening drought is "not just reckless," but also jeopardizes the livelihoods of local residents and undermines fragile ecosystems.

Federal officials assert that the changes to water management are intended to balance the needs of communities, agriculture, and ecosystems.

However, the plan has drawn criticism from various stakeholders, including environmental groups and fishing organizations, who argue that it could exacerbate existing challenges faced by struggling fish populations such as Chinook salmon and Delta smelt.

The lawmakers, in a letter addressed to Scott Cameron, the acting commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation, expressed their concerns that the proposed changes could significantly endanger California's water supply.

They warned that the plan could disrupt coordinated operations between state and federal agencies, ultimately weakening environmental protections that are crucial for the Delta's ecosystem.

In their letter, Garamendi and his colleagues highlighted the necessity of a scientifically backed approach to managing the Delta's fresh water supply and ecosystem.

They pointed out that increased pumping could force the State Water Project to reduce its water exports, further complicating water availability for millions of Californians who rely on it.

Supporters of the plan, including large agricultural water agencies like the Westlands Water District, argue that increased water flow is essential for farmers in the region.

Many farmers, who cultivate crops such as almonds and tomatoes, have long criticized state environmental regulations as overly restrictive and detrimental to their livelihoods.

Nevertheless, the Newsom administration has voiced strong opposition to the plan, warning that it could lead to a reduction in water availability for millions of Californians and pose risks to fish populations.

The administration's stance underscores the ongoing tension between agricultural interests and environmental protections in California's complex water management landscape.

Environmental advocates have raised alarms about the potential negative impacts of increased water pumping on the Delta's ecosystem.

They argue that the plan represents a significant rollback of protections that have been established to safeguard vulnerable fish species, which are already facing challenges due to habitat loss and climate change.

As the debate continues, the lawmakers remain committed to advocating for a water supply plan that prioritizes solutions over political maneuvering.

They emphasize the need for a collaborative approach that balances the needs of agriculture, communities, and the environment, ensuring the long-term sustainability of California's water resources.

In conclusion, the opposition to Trump's water pumping plan highlights the complexities of water management in California, where competing interests often clash.

The outcome of this debate will have significant implications for the state's agricultural sector, environmental health, and the millions of residents who depend on a reliable water supply.

Lawmakers Criticize Trump's Water Pumping Plan for California

lawmakers-criticize-trump-s-water-pumping-plan-for-california

The Amazon River is experiencing severe ecological decline due to climate change, with shrinking waters, dying fish, and endangered species at risk. Scientists warn of feedback loops that could trigger irreversible damage, while conservation efforts face mounting challenges.

## Amazon River Faces Crisis as Climate Change Threatens Ecosystems

Topic

Wildlife

Recent articles:

The Dangers of Throwing Apple Cores Out the Car Window

Wildfire Burn Scars Heighten Flooding Risks in Los Angeles

The Dangers of Tossing Apple Cores Out the Car Window

Trump Denies Colorado Disaster Aid, Accusations of Political Games Emerge

The Role of Small-Scale Bioenergy in Climate Resilience

Climate Change Drives Majority of Wildfire Emissions in Western US

Lawmakers Criticize Trump's Water Pumping Plan for California

Amazon River Faces Crisis as Climate Change Threatens Ecosystems

Study Reveals Dogs’ Diet Drives Climate Impact

Study Finds Wide Variation in Amazon's Response to Degradation and Climate Change

Dog Ownership's Climate Impact: Why Adopting a Pet May Outweigh Recycling

Conservation Aiding Tiger Populations