Dominion Energy Sues Trump Administration Over Offshore Wind Halt

Dec 25, 2025, 2:40 AM
Image for article Dominion Energy Sues Trump Administration Over Offshore Wind Halt

Hover over text to view sources

Dominion Energy has initiated a federal lawsuit against the Trump administration, contesting a recent order that paused construction on its Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (CVOW) project. The lawsuit, filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, seeks to lift the stop-work order issued by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) that halted all offshore construction activities on the project, which is crucial for Virginia's energy future.
The Trump administration's directive, announced earlier this week, affects five major offshore wind projects along the East Coast. Officials cited national security concerns, particularly regarding potential radar interference from the wind turbines, as the reason for the pause. However, Dominion argues that this decision jeopardizes the reliability of Virginia's power grid and threatens to increase costs for consumers.
In its legal filing, Dominion claims that the BOEM's order is arbitrary and unlawful, emphasizing that the CVOW project is fully permitted and has undergone extensive federal, state, and environmental reviews. The company asserts that the project is already significantly advanced, with construction approximately 50% complete, and stopping work now incurs substantial costs. According to Dominion, the halt is costing the company over $5 million per day in vessel expenses alone, in addition to costs associated with idle crews and stored equipment.
Dominion's CVOW project, located 27 to 44 miles off the Virginia coast, is expected to generate up to 2,600 megawatts of electricity, enough to power around 660,000 homes once operational. The company has invested approximately $8.9 billion in the project, which is part of a broader strategy to meet the growing energy demands in Virginia, including those from military installations and data centers.
The lawsuit has drawn political attention, with Virginia lawmakers from both parties criticizing the federal pause. They argue that the administration has not provided sufficient evidence to justify halting a project that is already under construction and warn that the decision could threaten thousands of jobs in the region.
In addition to the immediate financial implications, Dominion warns that even minor delays could disrupt the project's tightly scheduled construction timeline, potentially leading to hundreds of millions of dollars in additional costs that would ultimately impact ratepayers. The company is seeking a temporary restraining order to allow construction to resume while the case is adjudicated, and it has indicated plans to pursue a preliminary injunction if necessary.
The broader context of this legal battle reflects a growing tension between the Trump administration's energy policies and the push for renewable energy development. The administration's recent actions have raised concerns among industry stakeholders about the future of offshore wind projects in the US, with some developers expressing intentions to sue over similar halts on their projects.
As the legal proceedings unfold, the outcome of Dominion's lawsuit could have significant implications for the future of offshore wind energy in the United States, particularly in light of the increasing demand for clean energy solutions amid climate change concerns.
The court has yet to rule on Dominion's request for a temporary restraining order, leaving the future of the CVOW project uncertain as it navigates the complexities of federal regulations and political dynamics.
In summary, Dominion Energy's lawsuit against the Trump administration highlights the critical intersection of energy policy, legal frameworks, and the urgent need for renewable energy development in the face of climate challenges. The outcome of this case may set a precedent for how similar projects are managed and regulated in the future.

Related articles

Solar Power and Battery Storage Thrive Amid Policy Changes

Despite significant policy shifts under the Trump administration, solar power and battery storage are experiencing remarkable growth. This surge is driven by high demand from data centers and the resilience of clean energy technologies, which continue to attract investment and innovation.

Kentucky AG Rejects Climate Change Harm, Cites 'Net Benefits' of Emissions

Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman's letter to the EPA disputes climate change science, claiming emissions offer 'net benefits.' The letter faces criticism from scientific experts and lawmakers who note Kentucky's recent severe weather and economic impacts of climate policy shifts.

White House Considers Government Stakes in Nuclear Energy Companies

The White House is exploring government ownership stakes in nuclear energy companies to bolster domestic uranium production. Analysts highlight Centrus Energy and BWXT as potential targets, citing federal funding and geopolitical factors like the Russia-Ukraine war. Market optimism for nuclear energy ties to AI demand has boosted stock prices.

Trump Administration Targets Climate Regulations Amid Policy Shifts

The Trump administration has moved to dismantle key climate policies, including reversing the EPA's endangerment finding and withdrawing from the Paris Agreement. These actions aim to prioritize economic growth over environmental regulations, sparking legal challenges and scientific debate.

Trump Blames Renewables for Energy Costs; Experts Cite Other Factors

President Trump claims renewable energy drives rising electricity prices, but experts attribute cost hikes to demand growth, aging infrastructure, and natural gas price spikes. Critics argue GOP policies threaten clean energy development, risking job losses and higher bills.