Trump Administration Increases Political Use of Justice Department

Jan 14, 2026, 2:28 AM
Image for article Trump Administration Increases Political Use of Justice Department

Hover over text to view sources

The Trump administration has ramped up its efforts to leverage the Justice Department (DOJ) for political purposes, raising significant concerns about the independence of the agency. Recent developments include a criminal investigation into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and the establishment of a new assistant attorney general role that reports directly to the White House, both of which appear to be politically motivated actions aimed at exerting control over key governmental functions.
The investigation into Powell, who has not been charged with any crime, follows Trump's long-standing criticism of the Federal Reserve's monetary policy, particularly its interest rate decisions. Trump has publicly suggested that Powell's actions warrant scrutiny, and the DOJ's probe seems to align with these sentiments. Critics, including some Republican lawmakers, have characterized the investigation as a blatant attempt to undermine the independence of the Federal Reserve, with Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina labeling it a "political ploy.".
In a notable shift, Vice President JD Vance announced the creation of a new assistant attorney general position focused on fraud investigations, which will operate under the direct supervision of the White House. This arrangement is unprecedented and signals a troubling erosion of the traditional boundaries between the executive branch and the DOJ. Vance's comments during a White House briefing indicated that this new role would be closely tied to ongoing fraud scandals, particularly in Minnesota, which the administration has sought to politicize.
The implications of these actions are profound. By placing a DOJ official under White House oversight, the Trump administration is effectively blurring the lines that have historically separated political influence from judicial processes. This move could set a dangerous precedent, allowing the executive branch to exert undue influence over legal investigations that should remain impartial.
Moreover, the administration's approach to criminal justice has shifted significantly since Trump took office. In his first week, Trump revoked policies established under the Biden administration that aimed to reduce harsh sentencing practices and address racial disparities in the criminal justice system. The new interim guidance issued by the acting deputy attorney general signals a return to more punitive measures, including the potential expansion of mandatory minimum sentences and increased federal enforcement of immigration violations.
These changes have drawn bipartisan criticism, with experts warning that they could exacerbate existing issues within the criminal justice system, such as overcrowded prisons and ineffective rehabilitation efforts. The focus on punitive measures rather than rehabilitation reflects a broader trend within the Trump administration to prioritize political objectives over evidence-based policy solutions.
As the Trump administration continues to leverage the DOJ for political gain, the potential for backlash from both political opponents and within the Republican Party itself remains. The investigation into Powell, in particular, has prompted skepticism among some GOP members, who fear that such actions could undermine the credibility of the Federal Reserve and the broader economic stability.
In conclusion, the Trump administration's increasing use of the Justice Department as a tool for political leverage raises serious questions about the integrity of the US legal system. The establishment of a new assistant attorney general role under White House supervision and the targeting of figures like Jerome Powell illustrate a concerning trend that could have lasting implications for the independence of federal institutions. As these developments unfold, the need for vigilance in protecting the integrity of the DOJ becomes ever more critical.

Related articles

Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Congressman Bost's Election Challenge

The US Supreme Court has ruled 7-2 that Congressman Mike Bost can challenge Illinois election laws regarding mail-in ballots. The decision allows Bost's lawsuit to proceed, emphasizing candidates' rights to contest election regulations, though dissenting justices warn it may lead to an increase in frivolous lawsuits.

Senate Rejects Resolution to Limit Trump's Military Actions in Venezuela

The US Senate has voted against a war powers resolution that would have restricted President Trump's ability to conduct military operations in Venezuela without congressional approval. The resolution failed by a narrow margin, with some Republican senators reversing their support after receiving assurances from the Trump administration.

Trump Warns Iran Amid Rising Death Toll from Protests

As protests in Iran escalate, the death toll has surpassed 2,500, prompting US President Donald Trump to issue stern warnings against the execution of protesters. Iranian officials have signaled rapid trials and potential executions, intensifying international concerns over the government's crackdown.

Senate Blocks Resolution to Limit Trump's Venezuela Military Powers

The US Senate narrowly blocked a bipartisan resolution aimed at restricting President Trump's military actions in Venezuela. The resolution, which sought to prevent unauthorized military engagement, was defeated by a 51-49 vote, highlighting ongoing tensions over executive war powers.

Senate Republicans Block Venezuela War Powers Resolution Amid Trump Pressure

Senate Republicans voted to dismiss a war powers resolution aimed at limiting President Trump's military authority in Venezuela. The decision followed intense lobbying from Trump, resulting in two GOP senators reversing their support for the measure. The outcome highlights ongoing tensions within the party regarding Trump's foreign policy ambitions.