Trump Administration Orders Removal of Native American Signs in Parks

Jan 30, 2026, 2:52 AM
Image for article Trump Administration Orders Removal of Native American Signs in Parks

Hover over text to view sources

The Trump administration has initiated a controversial directive mandating national parks to revise or remove signs addressing critical topics such as Native American history and climate change. This decision follows an executive order issued by President Donald Trump in March 2025, which aimed to eliminate what officials described as "partisan ideology" from federal sites, including references that discuss racism and environmental issues.
Reports indicate that park staff across multiple states, including Texas, Arizona, Colorado, Montana, Wyoming, and Utah, have received notices to alter or eliminate displays that cover Native American mistreatment and climate change impacts. Notable parks affected by this directive include the Grand Canyon, Glacier National Park, and Big Bend National Park.
The Department of the Interior, led by Secretary Doug Burgum, stated that these changes are part of a broader effort to ensure that federal interpretive materials align with "shared national values." Critics, however, have condemned this move as an attempt to whitewash US history and obscure substantial environmental concerns.
At the Grand Canyon, park staff have recently removed sections from exhibits that informed visitors about the historical displacement of Native American tribes to create the national park. Similarly, references to environmental degradation caused by ranchers and tourists have been cut from displays. The Glacier National Park has also been instructed to remove signage that outlines the potential loss of its glaciers due to climate change, a significant concern given the park's renowned ice formations.
Critics argue that these actions undermine the educational mission of national parks, which have long served to inform the public about the complexities of American history and environmental science. Kristen Brengel, a senior vice president at the National Parks Conservation Association, emphasized that the removal of such signs "should offend every American," noting that park staff feel pressured to conform with the administration's narrative or risk their jobs.
Moreover, the directive extends beyond specific historical references. It has also prompted the National Park Service to review materials in visitor centers and gift shops, leading to the potential removal of educational materials that discuss slavery, Indigenous rights, and climate science. This systematic erasure of diverse narratives is seen as part of a larger trend of censorship under the Trump administration, raising alarms among historians and environmental advocates alike.
Examples of removed materials include a famous photograph titled "Scourged Back," which depicts the brutal reality of slavery, as well as displays at the Independence National Historical Park that acknowledge George Washington's ownership of enslaved individuals. Such actions have sparked public outcry and led to initiatives like "Save Our Signs," which aims to document and preserve the lost educational materials from national parks.
The implications of these changes are profound, as national parks are meant to reflect the full spectrum of American history and the ongoing challenges posed by climate change. With national parks warming at twice the rate of the rest of the country, the removal of relevant climate information could leave visitors uninformed about the immediate threats to these cherished landscapes.
In light of these developments, advocates are pushing for congressional action to reverse budget cuts and restore educational materials to ensure that national parks continue to serve their critical role in informing the public about our history and environment. The ongoing struggle to preserve the integrity of national park narratives underscores the importance of open dialogue about America's past and present environmental realities.
As the situation evolves, the future of educational signage in national parks remains uncertain, with advocates and historians alike advocating for transparency and the inclusion of diverse perspectives in the stories told within these iconic American spaces.

Related articles

Portland's Political Year in Review: Frogs, Shelters, and Governance

Portland's political landscape in 2025 was marked by significant challenges, including homelessness, housing crises, and federal immigration policies. Mayor Keith Wilson focused on increasing shelter capacity while facing protests and community activism. Voter-approved measures aimed at improving public schools and parks highlighted civic engagement amid ongoing political tensions.

Wildlife Advocates Prepare Lawsuit Over Clear Lake Hitch Protections

Wildlife advocates are threatening to sue the Trump administration for failing to provide federal protections for the Clear Lake hitch, a threatened fish species native to Northern California. The Center for Biological Diversity claims the US Fish and Wildlife Service has ignored scientific evidence pointing to the fish's imminent extinction due to habitat loss and climate change.

Lawmakers Press Insurers on Payout Requirements for Wildfire Victims

California lawmakers are demanding explanations from insurance companies regarding stringent requirements for wildfire damage payouts. Amidst a growing insurance crisis exacerbated by recent fires, legislators are proposing new bills to enhance oversight and ensure timely compensation for affected homeowners.

Trump Signs Order to Federalize LA Wildfire Rebuild Permits

President Trump has signed an executive order transferring wildfire rebuilding permit authority in Los Angeles from local and state agencies to federal control. The move aims to expedite rebuilding efforts following devastating wildfires, but has drawn criticism from state officials who argue it complicates the recovery process.

Trump Seizes Control of LA Wildfire Recovery Efforts

President Trump has signed an executive order to take over the wildfire recovery process in Los Angeles, prompting backlash from state officials. The order aims to expedite rebuilding by bypassing local permitting regulations, a move Gov. Gavin Newsom and others criticize as unnecessary and politically motivated.