Trump Withdraws U.S. from Key International Climate Organizations

Jan 9, 2026, 2:51 AM
Image for article Trump Withdraws U.S. from Key International Climate Organizations

Hover over text to view sources

In a significant shift in US foreign policy, President Donald Trump has ordered the withdrawal of the United States from 66 international organizations, including critical entities such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). This decision, formalized through a presidential memorandum, reflects a broader isolationist approach under Trump's "America First" policy, which prioritizes national interests over global cooperation.
The withdrawal encompasses 31 United Nations agencies and 35 non-UN organizations, marking a historic break from multilateralism that has characterized US diplomacy for decades. The White House has justified this move by claiming that these organizations promote "radical climate policies" and agendas that are "ineffective or hostile" to American interests.

Implications for Climate Action

The exit from the UNFCCC is particularly notable, as it is the first time a country has withdrawn from this foundational treaty, which underpins global climate governance and cooperation. This treaty is essential for international climate negotiations, including the Paris Agreement, which aims to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius. By stepping away from these frameworks, the US risks losing its ability to influence global climate policy and funding mechanisms, which are crucial for developing countries facing climate challenges.
Experts warn that this withdrawal could exacerbate the already dire situation regarding climate change. The US is one of the largest historical emitters of greenhouse gases, and its absence from key discussions may hinder global efforts to mitigate climate impacts. According to the Global Carbon Project, US emissions accounted for approximately 12.7% of global emissions in 2024, highlighting the country's significant role in climate dynamics.

Reactions from the International Community

The international response to Trump's decision has been largely critical. Former US Secretary of State John Kerry described the withdrawal as a "gift to China," suggesting that it allows other nations to evade their climate responsibilities without US oversight or leadership. Environmental advocates have expressed concern that this move undermines decades of diplomatic efforts to combat climate change and protect biodiversity, potentially leading to increased global warming and ecological degradation.
Organizations like the Union of Concerned Scientists have emphasized that the US withdrawal from the IPCC will diminish its influence over global climate science, which is vital for informed policymaking. Delta Merner from the organization stated, "Walking away doesn't make science disappear—it only leaves policymakers, businesses, and communities flying in the dark".

Domestic and Global Consequences

Domestically, the Trump administration argues that withdrawing from these organizations will allow for a reallocation of resources towards internal infrastructure and border security, claiming that taxpayer money has been wasted on ineffective international commitments. However, critics argue that this approach could lead to long-term economic disadvantages as the global economy increasingly shifts towards renewable energy and sustainable practices.
The implications of this withdrawal extend beyond climate policy. It signals a broader retreat from international cooperation on various fronts, including health, human rights, and security. The US has already distanced itself from organizations like the World Health Organization and UNESCO, further isolating itself on the global stage.

Conclusion

Trump's decision to withdraw the US from key international climate organizations marks a pivotal moment in global diplomacy and climate action. As the world grapples with the escalating impacts of climate change, the absence of US leadership in these critical discussions raises significant concerns about the future of global cooperation and the effectiveness of international climate agreements. The long-term consequences of this withdrawal will likely be felt not only in the US but across the globe, as nations strive to address the pressing challenges posed by climate change and biodiversity loss.

Related articles

Trump's Withdrawal from IPCC: A Signal on Climate Change

President Trump's decision to withdraw the US from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reflects a broader rejection of climate science. This move, which has been criticized by scientists, signals a dismissal of the human impact on climate change and undermines international efforts to address global warming.

Mendocino County Reinstates 'Climate Change' Language in Policy

Mendocino County's Board of Supervisors has unanimously decided to reinstate the term 'climate change' in its legislative platform, reversing a previous amendment that replaced it with 'climate resiliency.' This decision reflects the county's commitment to addressing environmental issues despite the Trump administration's stance on climate policy.

Trump's Withdrawal from IPCC: A Signal on Climate Change Denial

President Trump's decision to withdraw the US from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reflects a broader rejection of established climate science. This move, seen as part of an anti-climate agenda, raises concerns about the implications for US participation in global climate discussions and the future of climate policy.

Trump Withdraws US from 66 International Organizations

President Donald Trump has announced the withdrawal of the United States from 66 international organizations, including key UN entities. This decision is part of a broader strategy to prioritize American interests and reduce funding for organizations deemed contrary to US sovereignty and economic goals.

Trump's Climate Change Views: Do Voters Align?

Donald Trump's controversial stance on climate change, labeling it a 'hoax,' contrasts sharply with the views of many US voters who support climate action. Recent polls indicate a significant majority of Americans favor investment in renewable energy and participation in international climate agreements.