In a significant shift in US foreign policy, President Donald Trump has ordered the withdrawal of the United States from 66 international organizations, including critical entities such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
Sources:
noticiasambientales.comdialogue.earthThis decision, formalized through a presidential memorandum, reflects a broader isolationist approach under Trump's "America First" policy, which prioritizes national interests over global cooperation.
Sources:
downtoearth.org.inen.ara.catThe withdrawal encompasses 31 United Nations agencies and 35 non-UN organizations, marking a historic break from multilateralism that has characterized US diplomacy for decades.The White House has justified this move by claiming that these organizations promote "radical climate policies" and agendas that are "ineffective or hostile" to American interests.
The exit from the UNFCCC is particularly notable, as it is the first time a country has withdrawn from this foundational treaty, which underpins global climate governance and cooperation.This treaty is essential for international climate negotiations, including the Paris Agreement, which aims to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius.
Sources:
downtoearth.org.inen.ara.catBy stepping away from these frameworks, the US risks losing its ability to influence global climate policy and funding mechanisms, which are crucial for developing countries facing climate challenges.
Sources:
downtoearth.org.inenvironewsnigeria.comExperts warn that this withdrawal could exacerbate the already dire situation regarding climate change.The US is one of the largest historical emitters of greenhouse gases, and its absence from key discussions may hinder global efforts to mitigate climate impacts.According to the Global Carbon Project, US emissions accounted for approximately 12.7% of global emissions in 2024, highlighting the country's significant role in climate dynamics.
The international response to Trump's decision has been largely critical.Former US Secretary of State John Kerry described the withdrawal as a "gift to China," suggesting that it allows other nations to evade their climate responsibilities without US oversight or leadership.
Source:
en.ara.catEnvironmental advocates have expressed concern that this move undermines decades of diplomatic efforts to combat climate change and protect biodiversity, potentially leading to increased global warming and ecological degradation.
Sources:
dialogue.earthenvironewsnigeria.comOrganizations like the Union of Concerned Scientists have emphasized that the US withdrawal from the IPCC will diminish its influence over global climate science, which is vital for informed policymaking.Delta Merner from the organization stated, "Walking away doesn't make science disappear—it only leaves policymakers, businesses, and communities flying in the dark".
Domestically, the Trump administration argues that withdrawing from these organizations will allow for a reallocation of resources towards internal infrastructure and border security, claiming that taxpayer money has been wasted on ineffective international commitments.
Sources:
noticiasambientales.comdialogue.earthHowever, critics argue that this approach could lead to long-term economic disadvantages as the global economy increasingly shifts towards renewable energy and sustainable practices.The implications of this withdrawal extend beyond climate policy.It signals a broader retreat from international cooperation on various fronts, including health, human rights, and security.The US has already distanced itself from organizations like the World Health Organization and UNESCO, further isolating itself on the global stage.
Trump's decision to withdraw the US from key international climate organizations marks a pivotal moment in global diplomacy and climate action.As the world grapples with the escalating impacts of climate change, the absence of US leadership in these critical discussions raises significant concerns about the future of global cooperation and the effectiveness of international climate agreements.The long-term consequences of this withdrawal will likely be felt not only in the US but across the globe, as nations strive to address the pressing challenges posed by climate change and biodiversity loss.