Trump Withdraws US from 66 International Organizations

Jan 8, 2026, 2:30 AM

Hover over text to view sources

President Donald Trump has signed a Presidential Memorandum directing the withdrawal of the United States from 66 international organizations that he claims no longer serve American interests. This decision includes ceasing participation in 35 non-United Nations (UN) organizations and 31 UN entities, which the administration argues operate contrary to US national interests, security, and economic prosperity.

The organizations targeted for withdrawal include the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which is a key treaty for international climate negotiations. The Trump administration has characterized many of these entities as redundant, mismanaged, and unnecessary, asserting that they promote agendas that conflict with US sovereignty and economic strength.

This move follows a comprehensive review of all international organizations and treaties that the US is involved with, initiated earlier this year. The White House stated that the withdrawals aim to end American taxpayer funding for entities that advance globalist agendas over US priorities, thereby reallocating resources to support missions that align more closely with American interests.

Among the organizations from which the US will withdraw are the UN Population Fund (UNFPA), which focuses on sexual and reproductive health, and UN Women, which promotes gender equality and women's empowerment. The administration has previously cut funding to these agencies, reflecting a long-standing skepticism towards multilateral institutions.

Critics of the withdrawal argue that it represents a significant retreat from global cooperation, particularly in addressing pressing issues like climate change. Experts warn that the US exit from the UNFCCC could hinder global efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions, as it may embolden other nations to delay their commitments.

The decision to withdraw from these organizations marks a stark departure from the approach taken by previous administrations, both Republican and Democratic, which generally sought to engage with international bodies to address global challenges. Daniel Forti, a senior UN analyst, noted that this reflects a crystallization of the US approach to multilateralism, characterized by a "my way or the highway" mentality.

The Trump administration's strategy has already seen the US suspend support for various international organizations, including the World Health Organization and the UN Human Rights Council. This selective engagement with international bodies has raised concerns about the future of US leadership in global governance and the potential implications for international stability.

As the US moves forward with these withdrawals, the State Department has indicated that additional reviews of international organizations are ongoing, suggesting that more changes could be on the horizon. The implications of this shift will likely resonate across various sectors, from climate policy to international relations, as the US redefines its role on the global stage.

In summary, Trump's decision to withdraw from these international organizations underscores a significant shift in US foreign policy, prioritizing national interests over global cooperation. The long-term effects of this strategy remain to be seen, particularly in the context of pressing global challenges that require collective action.

Trump's Withdrawal from IPCC: A Signal on Climate Change

President Trump's decision to withdraw the US from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reflects a broader rejection of climate science. This move, which has been criticized by scientists, signals a dismissal of the human impact on climate change and undermines international efforts to address global warming.

Mendocino County Reinstates 'Climate Change' Language in Policy

Mendocino County's Board of Supervisors has unanimously decided to reinstate the term 'climate change' in its legislative platform, reversing a previous amendment that replaced it with 'climate resiliency.' This decision reflects the county's commitment to addressing environmental issues despite the Trump administration's stance on climate policy.

Trump's Withdrawal from IPCC: A Signal on Climate Change Denial

President Trump's decision to withdraw the US from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reflects a broader rejection of established climate science. This move, seen as part of an anti-climate agenda, raises concerns about the implications for US participation in global climate discussions and the future of climate policy.

Trump Withdraws U.S. from Key International Climate Organizations

President Donald Trump has ordered the withdrawal of the United States from 66 international organizations, including major climate bodies like the IPCC and UNFCCC. This move is part of a broader strategy to prioritize national interests over global cooperation, raising concerns about the future of climate action and biodiversity efforts.

Trump's Climate Change Views: Do Voters Align?

Donald Trump's controversial stance on climate change, labeling it a 'hoax,' contrasts sharply with the views of many US voters who support climate action. Recent polls indicate a significant majority of Americans favor investment in renewable energy and participation in international climate agreements.