The Trump administration's abrupt cancellation of nearly 700 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) grants nationwide—worth $11 billion in total—created a stark divide between blue and red states, according to a KFF Health News analysis.Democratic-led states that sued the federal government regained most of their funds, while Republican-controlled states faced severe losses, disrupting public health infrastructure and sparking legal battles over funding reinstatement.
Source:
kffhealthnews.orgUneven Impact of Grant Cuts.Initially, grant cancellations affected blue and red states roughly equally.Four of the five jurisdictions with the largest number of terminated grants were led by Democrats: California, the District of Columbia, Illinois, and Massachusetts.However, after attorneys general and governors from about two dozen blue states sued in federal court and won an injunction, the balance shifted dramatically.Of the five states with the most canceled grants, four are now led by Republicans: Texas, Georgia, Oklahoma, and Ohio.
Source:
kffhealthnews.orgLegal Battles and Funding Restorations.In blue states, nearly 80% of the CDC grant cuts have been restored, compared to fewer than 5% in red states, according to KFF Health News.For example, California retained every grant the Trump administration attempted to claw back, while Texas remains the state with the most grants terminated, losing at least 30.The abrupt funding cuts in Texas contributed to a measles outbreak that sickened 4,500 people and killed 16 across the US and Mexico.
Source:
kffhealthnews.orgColorado, which joined the lawsuit, saw 10 of its 11 initial grant terminations reversed, while neighboring states like Wyoming and Kansas collectively lost 55 grants with none restored.
Source:
kffhealthnews.orgHuman Toll of Funding Losses.In Jackson, Ohio, a half-dozen community health workers found their grant canceled five months early in March, leaving the county health department $500,000 short and forcing immediate layoffs.Health Commissioner Kevin Aston described the financial strain: "Canceling funding midcycle was really scary." The cuts disrupted critical programs that once supported 11 Appalachian counties, now reduced to a single area.Community health worker Marsha Radabaugh scaled back her efforts, helping homeless clients with Medicaid forms and hygiene kits but unable to maintain outreach due to staff reductions.
Source:
kffhealthnews.orgPublic Health Infrastructure at Risk.Federal CDC funding accounts for more than half of state and local health department budgets, according to KFF.The Trump cuts disrupted efforts to modernize disease detection systems and expand vaccination programs.In Columbus, Ohio, the city lost $3 million of its $6.2 million in CDC grants, leading to layoffs of 11 staff focused on infectious disease outbreaks and halting plans for a new electronic health record system."We've never had a grant midcycle just get pulled from us," said Health Commissioner Mysheika Roberts.
Source:
kffhealthnews.orgThe abrupt loss also forced the county to pay unemployment benefits unexpectedly, straining its finances.
Source:
cnn.comPolitical Polarization and Legal Challenges.HHS Secretary Robert F.Kennedy Jr, an anti-vaccine advocate, justified the cuts as a response to the pandemic but faced criticism for undermining public health infrastructure.KFF noted that states Trump won in 2024 received over half of the $15 billion CDC allocated in fiscal 2023, reflecting political disparities in funding distribution.Legal battles continue, with Columbus and other Democratic-led municipalities suing to retain funds, while Republican-led states like Ohio chose not to challenge the cuts.A federal judge blocked the latest round of terminations, but uncertainty remains over whether the cuts will be fully reversed by December.
Source:
kffhealthnews.orgLong-Term Consequences for Public Health.Experts warn that the "boom, bust, panic, neglect" funding cycle has left public health systems underprepared.Brent Ewig of the Association of Immunization Managers called the cuts a "predictable result" of unstable funding, risking readiness to respond to future outbreaks like measles.Meanwhile, some grants canceled were meant for long-term initiatives, including disease reporting upgrades and research on HIV and tuberculosis, which could have lasting impacts on public health capacity.
Source:
kffhealthnews.orgThe ongoing legal and political battles highlight the deepening polarization over federal support for state-level health programs.
