US Judge Questions Legality of Trump's $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee

Dec 20, 2025, 2:36 AM
Image for article US Judge Questions Legality of Trump's $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee

Hover over text to view sources

A federal judge raised significant doubts during a recent hearing about the US Chamber of Commerce's legal challenge to President Donald Trump's new $100,000 fee for H-1B visa applications. Judge Beryl Howell of the US District Court for the District of Columbia questioned the Chamber's request to block or overturn the fee, which was implemented as part of a broader immigration policy aimed at prioritizing American workers for high-skilled jobs.
The proclamation, signed by Trump, asserts that the fee is intended to combat "systemic abuse" of the H-1B visa program and to address national security concerns related to foreign workers in sensitive industries. Howell pointed out that the president has broad authority under immigration law, stating that Congress has granted this power, allowing the imposition of restrictions on foreign nationals entering the US.
During the hearing, Howell highlighted an example of a company that opted to hire an American worker instead of a foreign national due to the new fee structure. This example was presented as evidence that the proclamation might be achieving its intended goal of encouraging the hiring of American graduates. Howell remarked, "So from the defendant's perspective, the proclamation has only been in existence for a couple of months and is already working.".
Zachary Schauf, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, argued that the president's authority has never been used to impose such a fee, particularly one that regulates domestic employment practices. He emphasized that the fee could create significant barriers for employers, particularly in sectors that rely heavily on foreign talent, such as technology and healthcare.
The legal challenge is part of a broader backlash against the fee, which has been criticized for its potential to harm US businesses and the economy. California and 19 other states have also filed lawsuits against the fee, arguing that it exceeds the legal authority granted to the president and violates federal law. California Attorney General Rob Bonta stated that the fee would create unnecessary financial burdens, exacerbating labor shortages in essential services like education and healthcare.
The Chamber's lawsuit is one of several that have emerged in response to the fee, which dramatically raises the cost of obtaining H-1B visas from the typical range of $2,000 to $5,000 to $100,000. Critics argue that this increase could effectively serve as a ban on the H-1B program, particularly impacting startups and nonprofit organizations that cannot afford the new costs.
Howell also questioned whether the Chamber had the standing to file the lawsuit, suggesting that other organizations with clearer stakes in the matter might be better suited to challenge the fee. The Justice Department, defending the administration's actions, argued that the fee is a lawful exercise of presidential power and is necessary to protect American jobs from being displaced by cheaper foreign labor.
As the legal battles continue, many in the tech industry and other sectors that rely on H-1B workers are left in uncertainty. Immigration attorneys have reported an influx of inquiries from clients concerned about the implications of the fee, with many questioning whether they should proceed with job offers for foreign workers. The potential economic impact of the fee could be profound, threatening the competitiveness of US industries that depend on specialized skills not readily available in the domestic labor market.
In summary, the hearing highlighted the contentious nature of the $100,000 H-1B visa fee and the legal uncertainties surrounding it. With multiple lawsuits challenging the fee's legality, the outcome could have significant implications for US immigration policy and the economy as a whole.
The situation remains fluid as stakeholders await further developments in the courts and from the federal government regarding the future of the H-1B visa program and its associated costs.

Related articles

Tech Investor Proposes Alternatives to California's Wealth Tax Debate

As California's proposed wealth tax for billionaires sparks debate, tech investor David Friedberg suggests alternative revenue-raising strategies. He highlights the loopholes in current tax systems and proposes taxing capital gains on borrowed assets as a more effective solution.

Trump Calls for Big Tech to Cover AI Power Costs

President Donald Trump has urged major tech companies, particularly Microsoft, to ensure that their AI infrastructure does not lead to increased electricity costs for American consumers. His comments come amid rising concerns about the environmental impact and energy demands of data centers supporting AI technologies.

Trump Signs Order to Finalize TikTok Sale at $14 Billion Valuation

President Trump signed an executive order to finalize the sale of TikTok's US operations at a $14 billion valuation, addressing national security concerns. The deal involves US and global investors, with ByteDance retaining limited control, while experts question algorithm oversight and valuation discrepancies.

ByteDance to Retain 50% of TikTok US Profits in Trump Deal

ByteDance, TikTok's parent company, will likely retain 50% of the app's US profits under a Trump-backed deal, despite ceding majority ownership to US investors. The valuation of TikTok's US unit has sparked debate, with officials citing $14 billion but analysts calling it undervalued. Legal and political tensions remain unresolved as the deal navigates congressional and regulatory hurdles.

France and Germany Reject Trump's Threats on EU Tech Legislation

France and Germany have denounced US President Donald Trump's threats to impose tariffs on countries with digital taxes, asserting the EU's sovereign right to regulate technology. Both nations warned of retaliation if Washington attempts to coerce them into changing their digital regulations.